Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » ManageEngine IAM » MANMAN1782397883

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MANMAN1782397883)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident754 / 1000
Company LinkView ManageEngine IAM Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMANMAN1782397883
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORPredictable SSO ticket generation
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE02/06/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of ManageEngine IAM's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts ManageEngine IAM Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the ManageEngine IAM breach identified under incident ID MANMAN1782397883.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of ManageEngine IAM's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/manageengine-identity-and-access-management, the number of followers: 11342, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 754 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on ManageEngine IAM and their customers.

ManageEngine AD360 Suite recently reported "ManageEngine Patches Critical Account Takeover Flaw in AD360 Suite (CVE-2026-11374)", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

ManageEngine has disclosed a critical vulnerability, CVE-2026-11374, enabling unauthenticated account takeovers in its AD360 identity and access management suite.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting AD360, ADSelfService Plus, RecoveryManager Plus, M365 Manager Plus, ADAudit Plus.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Patches released for affected products, and began remediation that includes Strengthened SSO ticket generation to prevent predictability.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Organizations are urged to apply patches immediately due to the vulnerability’s pre-authentication nature.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating critical vulnerability, CVE-2026-11374, enabling unauthenticated account takeovers and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating successful exploitation grants access to a user’s identity and role. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating predictable SSO ticket generation, allowing attackers to craft or guess valid authentication tokens and Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating predictable SSO ticket generation, allowing attackers to...guess valid authentication tokens. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating potentially leading to...privilege escalation within enterprise networks. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating lateral movement within enterprise networks via compromised user identities. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (T1550.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers to craft or guess valid authentication tokens without credentials. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Account Access Removal (T1531) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating full account compromise via predictable SSO ticket generation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (95%)
Brute Force: Password Guessing (70%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (85%)
Lateral Movement
Valid Accounts (80%)
Defense Evasion
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (90%)
Impact
Account Access Removal (70%)

Sources & References