Comparison Overview
Malaysia Airports

Malaysia Airports
Malaysia Airports Corporate Office, Persiaran Korporat KLIA, Sepang, Selangor, MY, 64000
Last Update: 04/04/2026
𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 A Global Airport Group That Champions Connectivity and Sustainability 𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞 Hosting Joyful Connections 𝐎𝐮𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 Since its corporatisation in 1992 as Malaysia Airports Berhad, Malaysia Airports has grown into one ...

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Amsterdamseweg 55, Amstelveen, 1182 GP, NL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Malaysia Airports







KLM Royal Dutch Airlines






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Malaysia Airports in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KLM Royal Dutch Airlines in 2026.
Incident History - Malaysia Airports (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Malaysia Airports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Malaysia Airports

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.