Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Malaysia Airlines » MALAIR1772151934

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MALAIR1772151934)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-95
Company Score Before Incident779 / 1000
Company Score After Incident684 / 1000
Company LinkView Malaysia Airlines Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERMALAIR1772151934
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE21/02/2026
STATUSUnconfirmed

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Malaysia Airlines's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Malaysia Airlines Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Malaysia Airlines breach identified under incident ID MALAIR1772151934.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Malaysia Airlines's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/malaysia-airlines, the number of followers: 375117, the industry type: Airlines and Aviation and the number of employees: 9082 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 779 and after the incident was 684 with a difference of -95 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Malaysia Airlines and their customers.

On 22 February 2026, Malaysia Airlines disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Qilin Ransomware Group Claims Attack on Malaysia Airlines".

The Qilin ransomware gang has listed Malaysia Airlines on its dark web leak site, marking the latest in a series of cyberattacks targeting the aviation sector.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Unconfirmed.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aviation sector...prime target for ransomware groups and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating qilin linked to Russian cybercriminal networks. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) model. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to sensitive personal and corporate data and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating internal documents...raising concerns about identity fraud. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating passenger names, passport details, internal documents. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating passenger names, passport details, internal documents. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating qilin has yet to provide proof of stolen data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware gang...ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted flight information displays, check-in systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups often withhold evidence during negotiations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (50%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)

Sources & References