Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MACJBS1770408307)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of MACT Health Board, Inc.'s Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts MACT Health Board, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the MACT Health Board, Inc. breach identified under incident ID MACJBS1770408307.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of MACT Health Board, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/mact-health-board-inc., the number of followers: 267, the industry type: Wellness and Fitness Services and the number of employees: 95 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 697 and after the incident was 561 with a difference of -136 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on MACT Health Board, Inc. and their customers.
On 23 December 2025, Jefferson Blount St. Clair (JBS) Mental Health Authority disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Ransomware Attack on Alabama Mental Health Provider Exposes 30,000 Patients’ Data".
The Jefferson Blount St.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 30,434 individuals' records, with nearly 30,434 records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notice to victims (without credit monitoring or identity theft protection offers).
The case underscores how Under investigation, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notice to victims (without credit monitoring or identity theft protection offers).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack affecting 30,434 individuals and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised sensitive personal and medical data spanning 2011-2025. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group Medusa claimed responsibility. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, health insurance details compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 168.6 GB of stolen data including diagnoses, treatment records and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating records from 2011 to 2025 compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 168.6 GB of stolen data, Medusa demanded $200,000 ransom. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack with data encryption confirmed and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating medusa posted sample documents as proof of breach. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group Medusa operates RaaS model and Execution Guardrails (T1480) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating targeted healthcare providers specifically. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- MACT Health Board, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mact-health-board-inc./incident/MACJBS1770408307
- MACT Health Board, Inc. CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mact-health-board-inc.
- MACT Health Board, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/macjbs1770408307-mact-health-board-jefferson-blount-st-clair-ransomware-november-2025/
- MACT Health Board, Inc. CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/mact-health-board-inc./history
- MACT Health Board, Inc. CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.comparitech.com/news/birmingham-mental-health-authority-warns-30000-people-of-data-breach-that-leaked-ssns-and-medical-info/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf