Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

MachineQ, a Comcast CompanyMachineQ, a Comcast Company
VS
TransUnionTransUnion
MachineQ, a Comcast Company

MachineQ, a Comcast Company

1800 Arch St, Philadelphia, 19103, US

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://machineq.com/
750/1000Fair

MachineQ, a Comcast Company, makes it simple for enterprises to build, connect and deploy long-range, low-power IoT solutions at scale. Utilizing LoRaWAN® technology, our fully integrated network connectivity platform delivers enhanced security and reduced total cost of...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:46
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TransUnion

TransUnion

Chicago, US

Last Update: 30/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.transunion.com
150/1000Critical

TransUnion is a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in the modern economy. We do this by providing an actionable picture of each person so they can be reliably represented in the marketplace. As a result, businesses and consumers can trans...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:17,105
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
15
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
MachineQ, a Comcast Company

MachineQ, a Comcast Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TransUnion

TransUnion

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MachineQ, a Comcast Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

TransUnion has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - MachineQ, a Comcast Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MachineQ, a Comcast Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TransUnion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TransUnion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
MachineQ, a Comcast Company

MachineQ, a Comcast Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TransUnion

TransUnion

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ALLSALFARTRA1789577043
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRADOMOPT1787978104
🔒 Incident : Breach
700TRACORMUN1786373838

FAQ

Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company company and TransUnion company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company and TransUnion, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company and TransUnion, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - MachineQ, a Comcast Company or TransUnion ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - MachineQ, a Comcast Company or TransUnion ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company and TransUnion, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between MachineQ, a Comcast Company and TransUnion, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA