Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)
VS
CapitaCapita
Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

244 5th Avenue, New York,, 10001, US

Last Update: 02/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://arcova.com
709/1000Moderate

Lynx Technology Partners is now part of Arcova. Founded in 2009, Lynx Technology Partners built a strong reputation for excellence in cybersecurity, compliance, and strategic advisory services. The firm was known for its disciplined execution and relationship-driven ap...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Capita

Capita

2 Kingdom Street, First Floor, London, England, GB, W2 6BD

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.capita.com
618/1000Poor

Capita is an outsourcer, helping clients across the public and private sectors run complex business processes more efficiently, creating better consumer experiences. Operating across eight countries, Capita’s 34,000 colleagues support primarily UK and European clients ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:25,516
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Capita

Capita

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capita in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Capita (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capita cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GITNPMCHEKEDLYN1790944654
Capita

Capita

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAP5833058101525
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
CAP93224923
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CAP2002120101625

FAQ

Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Capita company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Capita, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Capita, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) or Capita ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) or Capita ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Capita, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Capita, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108680
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to send template notifications by calling POST /sys/api/sendTemplateAnnouncement. Low-privileged attackers can supply forged sender, recipients, title, and template parameters to deliver messages appearing to come from admin or system accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108679
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the sendBusAnnouncement handler of SystemApiController that allows any authenticated user to send announcements without the required permissions. Low-privileged attackers can POST crafted bodies to /sys/api/sendBusAnnouncement with forged sender, recipients, title and content to deliver spoofed admin or system messages for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108678
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the queryUserRoles handler of SystemApiController that lets authenticated users read any user's role codes. Low-privileged attackers can send GET requests to /sys/api/queryUserRoles with an arbitrary username to enumerate role assignments and identify administrator accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108677
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in GET /sys/api/getUserByName that allows low-privileged authenticated users to retrieve any user's stored password value. Attackers can decrypt the AES-CBC protected response using the hard-coded key exposed by /sys/getEncryptedString to obtain administrators' password ciphertexts for offline guessing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108676
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysAnnouncementController downLoadFiles handler that allows low-privileged authenticated users to download announcement attachments. Attackers can supply a known announcement id to retrieve a ZIP of attachments from unreleased announcements or those addressed only to other users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8