Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » LUXSHARE-ICT CO., LTD. » LUXNVI1769024063

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LUXNVI1769024063)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-244
Company Score Before Incident830 / 1000
Company Score After Incident586 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLUXNVI1769024063
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED1TB of sensitive data
INCIDENT DATE15/06/2019
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of LUXSHARE-ICT CO., LTD.'s Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts LUXSHARE-ICT CO., LTD. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the LUXSHARE-ICT CO., LTD. breach identified under incident ID LUXNVI1769024063.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of LUXSHARE-ICT CO., LTD.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/luxshare-ict-co, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Computers and Electronics Manufacturing and the number of employees: 419 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 830 and after the incident was 586 with a difference of -244 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on LUXSHARE-ICT CO., LTD. and their customers.

On 15 December 2024, Luxshare disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "RansomHub Breach Exposes 1TB of Apple and Tech Giants’ Confidential Data".

In December 2024, Luxshare, a key Apple manufacturing partner based in Shenzhen, China, suffered a major ransomware attack by the cybercriminal group RansomHub, resulting in the theft of over 1TB of sensitive data.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 1TB of sensitive data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating major ransomware attack by the cybercriminal group RansomHub and Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating luxshare, a key Apple manufacturing partner, suffered a major ransomware attack. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack resulting in the theft of over 1TB of sensitive data. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Account Manipulation (T1098) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating pII of employees involved in Apple projects compromised. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to detailed circuit board specifications and internal repair procedures. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack by RansomHub, a group known for sophisticated evasion and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach disclosed on a dark web forum. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pII of employees (names, job titles, work email addresses) exposed. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 3D CAD models, circuit board layouts, mechanical component designs compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 1TB of sensitive data stolen, including engineering documents and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating internal repair procedures and confidential files accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 1TB of data exfiltrated and disclosed on a dark web forum and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach disclosed on a dark web forum. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack by RansomHub, known for encryption-based extortion and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating threatening to leak the data unless ransom is paid. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Supply Chain Compromise (80%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (60%)
Persistence
Account Manipulation (50%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (70%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Hide Artifacts (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defacement (40%)

Sources & References