What is the official website of LUNA R&D ?

The official website of LUNA R&D is https://www.lunatr.com.

What is LUNA R&D's cybersecurity risk score?

LUNA R&D has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 753 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has LUNA R&D experienced?

According to Rankiteo, LUNA R&D currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has LUNA R&D been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, LUNA R&D has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does LUNA R&D have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, LUNA R&D is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does LUNA R&D have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, LUNA R&D does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does LUNA R&D comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, LUNA R&D is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does LUNA R&D have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, LUNA R&D does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does LUNA R&D comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, LUNA R&D is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does LUNA R&D have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,LUNA R&D is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does LUNA R&D operate in ?

LUNA R&D operates primarily in the Embedded Software Products industry.

How many employees does LUNA R&D have ?

LUNA R&D employs approximately 0 people worldwide.

Does LUNA R&D own any subsidiaries ?

LUNA R&D presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does LUNA R&D have ?

LUNA R&D's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 140 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for LUNA R&D ?

LUNA R&D is classified under the NAICS code 51122, which corresponds to Software Publishers.

Does LUNA R&D have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, LUNA R&D does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does LUNA R&D have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, LUNA R&D maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/luna-rnd.

How many cybersecurity incidents has LUNA R&D experienced ?

As of August 3, 2026, Rankiteo reports that LUNA R&D has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does LUNA R&D have ?

LUNA R&D has an estimated 97 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

LUNA R&D

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

753

/1000

Fair

778

/1000

Fair

LUNA R&D Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

lunatr.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

LUNA R&D A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

LUNA R&D

LUNA R&D CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

LUNA R&D Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for LUNA R&D

Incidents vs Embedded Software Products Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LUNA R&D in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LUNA R&D in 2026.

Incident Types LUNA R&D vs Embedded Software Products Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LUNA R&D in 2026.

Incident History - LUNA R&D (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

LUNA R&D Subsidiaries

LUNA R&D

Embedded Software Products

Website: https://www.lunatr.com

Company Size: 0

Landis+GyrAppliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing

ETRELManufacturing

Rhebo OT & IIoT SecurityIT Services and IT Consulting

True Energy A/S - a Landis+Gyr CompanySoftware Development

LUNA Elektrik Elektronik San. Tic. A.Ş.Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing

Loading…

LUNA R&D Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

LUNA R&D CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT): Powering Global Defense and Aerospace Innovation in 2025

As of 2025, Lockheed Martin Corporation remains a global powerhouse in defense, aerospace, and space technology.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18577

SUMMARY

An incomplete patch for CVE-2026-18556 allows for authentication bypass and account takeover in N-central Versions through 2026.3.1

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:A/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10848

SUMMARY

The OCPP 1.6 client in subsys/net/lib/ocpp parsed inbound WAMP RPC frames in parse_rpc_msg() (subsys/net/lib/ocpp/ocpp_j.c) using a hand-rolled helper, extract_string_field(), that copied the message's uid and action fields with strncpy(out_buf, token + 1, outlen - 1) and then scanned the result with strchr(out_buf, '"'). Because strncpy does not NUL-terminate the destination when the source is at least outlen - 1 (127) bytes long, the subsequent strchr reads past the 128-byte destination buffer into adjacent stack memory; if a " byte is found beyond the buffer, a one-byte out-of-bounds NUL write also occurs. A related defect in extract_payload() runs strchr/strrchr over the receive buffer, which may not be NUL-terminated when a maximal-length frame fills it. The parsed bytes come directly from the OCPP central-system server over a websocket: the reader thread fills recv_buf via websocket_recv_msg() and calls parse_rpc_msg() on each inbound DATA frame (subsys/net/lib/ocpp/ocpp.c). A malicious or compromised central server, or an on-path attacker (OCPP is commonly deployed over plain ws://), can send an RPC frame whose uid or action field is 127+ bytes with no closing quote, triggering the out-of-bounds access. The primary impact is a remotely triggerable denial of service: the unbounded scan can fault on an unmapped page, and the stray NUL write can corrupt adjacent stack state. The over-read data is not reflected to the peer, so disclosure is limited. The feature is EXPERIMENTAL and must be explicitly enabled (CONFIG_OCPP). The fix replaces the manual parser with the bounds-respecting json_mixed_arr_parse() and copies the extracted uid with an explicitly NUL-terminated buffer, eliminating both over-reads.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.0

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.7

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-9856

SUMMARY

A vulnerability in huggingface/transformers versions <=5.8.0.dev0 allows an attacker to perform arbitrary file writes via path traversal. The issue resides in the `save_pretrained()` methods of `PreTrainedTokenizerBase` and `ProcessorMixin`, where keys from the `chat_template` dictionary are used directly as filenames without proper validation. An attacker can exploit this by publishing a malicious Hugging Face Hub repository with a crafted `tokenizer_config.json` file. When a victim downloads and saves the tokenizer or processor, the attacker-controlled keys can escape the intended save directory, enabling arbitrary file writes with attacker-controlled content. This vulnerability affects multiple processors inheriting from `ProcessorMixin`, including Idefics, Florence, Gemma, Phi, and Qwen-VL.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-65321

SUMMARY

PyAthena prior to 3.35.4 contains a sql injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL by exploiting improper quote-escaping in DefaultParameterFormatter.format(), which routes DELETE and CTAS statements to the _escape_hive function that backslash-escapes single quotes rather than doubling them. Because Athena and Trino do not treat backslashes as escape characters inside string literals, attacker-supplied input such as a single quote followed by SQL syntax causes the parser to terminate the string literal prematurely, enabling data exfiltration via UNION SELECT, execution of destructive statements, and attacker-controlled CTAS destination and content.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 9.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10774

SUMMARY

Zephyr's Bluetooth Mesh subnet key management leaks one PSA Crypto key slot on every subnet-key teardown. In subsys/bluetooth/mesh/subnet.c, net_keys_create() imports the Private Beacon Key into a PSA key slot under CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS (enabled by default), but subnet_keys_destroy() guarded the matching psa_destroy_key() with CONFIG_BT_MESH_V1d1. That Kconfig symbol was removed when explicit Mesh 1.0.1 support was dropped, so the destroy branch became permanently dead code and the import is never balanced by a destroy. The imbalanced teardown is reached every time subnet keys are destroyed: deleting a subnet (Config Server NetKey Delete), completing a Key Refresh Procedure (which retires the old key set), and resetting/re-provisioning the node. The over-the-air triggers are processed only under the node's device key, so they are exercisable by the provisioner or network administrator that owns the node, reachable over the Bluetooth Mesh network. With the default CONFIG_MBEDTLS_PSA_KEY_SLOT_COUNT of 16, repeated add/delete or key-refresh cycles exhaust the shared PSA key-slot pool after roughly a dozen rounds. Once exhausted, bt_mesh_private_beacon_key() and thus subnet creation fail: the node can no longer add subnets or complete key refresh, and other PSA crypto consumers on the device may be starved, until the device is rebooted. The fix aligns the destroy guard with the import guard (CONFIG_BT_MESH_PRIV_BEACONS) so each slot is freed.

Published

Date2026-08-02

Updated

Date2026-08-02

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

0.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…