Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa Group Digital HangarLufthansa Group Digital Hangar
VS
KLM Royal Dutch AirlinesKLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar

Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar

undefined, _, undefined, undefined, DE

Last Update: 09/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://digitalhangar.aero/
752/1000Fair

We create the world's best connected #TravelExperience bringing together the power of physical, human and digital experience for all Lufthansa Group airline brands. Hereby we're committed to drive the digital transformation to become leader and innovator in developing n...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:241
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Amsterdamseweg 55, Amstelveen, 1182 GP, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://klmf.ly/R05uLo
731/1000Moderate

Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:22,827
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar

Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLM Royal Dutch Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar

Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KLM304080925
🔒 Incident : Breach
KLM2289123

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Group Digital Hangar and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8