Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LOP1780332157)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Lopesan's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Lopesan Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Lopesan breach identified under incident ID LOP1780332157.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Lopesan's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lopesan, the number of followers: 58321, the industry type: Hospitality and the number of employees: 1476 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 781 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -94 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Lopesan and their customers.
On 11 May 2026, Lopesan Group disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Lopesan Group Faces Second Major Data Exposure in Two Years".
Gran Canaria’s largest accommodation operator, the Lopesan Group, is under investigation following a suspected security breach that may have exposed 27,629 customer records.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 27,629 customer records, with nearly 27,629 records at risk.
In response, and began remediation that includes Forensic analysis and technical audits.
The case underscores how Under investigation.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unauthorized access to central systems, and persistent vulnerabilities in the group’s systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including failure elsewhere in the infrastructure, and second major data exposure in two years. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including persistent vulnerabilities in the group’s systems, and systemic security gap. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating compromised data includes full names, email addresses, ages, stay dates and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating assigned rooms, language preferences, and services used details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including 27,629 customer records exposed, and data breach impacting customer records and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including unauthorized access to central systems, and medium-high impact event. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating forensic analysis and technical audits to assess full scope and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating persistent vulnerabilities in the group’s systems. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Lopesan Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lopesan/incident/LOP1780332157
- Lopesan CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lopesan
- Lopesan Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/lop1780332157-lopesan-group-breach-may-2026/
- Lopesan CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/lopesan/history
- Lopesan CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.apd.cat/en/data-protection/a-new-security-breach-in-lopesan-exposes-the-history-of-27-629-tourists-in-maspalomas_14219_102.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf