Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » London Ambulance Service NHS Trust » WELLON1770196359

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (WELLON1770196359)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-68
Company Score Before Incident719 / 1000
Company Score After Incident651 / 1000
Company LinkView London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERWELLON1770196359
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORHuman Error, IT System Failures, Lost Devices
DATA EXPOSEDMedical records, emergency care notes,...
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2023
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust breach identified under incident ID WELLON1770196359.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/london-ambulance-service-nhs-trust, the number of followers: 25593, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 2611 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 719 and after the incident was 651 with a difference of -68 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on London Ambulance Service NHS Trust and their customers.

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust recently reported "Rising Data Breaches in UK Ambulance Services", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Over the past three years, UK ambulance services have reported more than 4,000 data breaches, with incidents surging in recent years.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Medical records, emergency care notes, personal contact details, with nearly 4000+ (over three years) records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Need for stronger data protection measures to maintain public trust and prevent operational strain on ambulance services, and recommending next steps like Implement stronger data protection measures, enhance cybersecurity training, and improve IT system resilience.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating human error...exposing sensitive data such as medical records and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating iT system failures...containing personal data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating lost devices containing personal data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating medical records, emergency care notes, personal contact details exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 4,000+ data breaches over three years and Exfiltration Over Physical Medium (T1052) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lost devices containing personal data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating iT system failures...exposing sensitive data and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential delay in emergency responses. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
User Execution: Malicious File (40%)
Valid Accounts (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)
Exfiltration Over Physical Medium (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References