Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Lockbits SpA » LOCCYB1783614618

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LOCCYB1783614618)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-149
Company Score Before Incident674 / 1000
Company Score After Incident525 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLOCCYB1783614618
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Lockbits SpA's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Lockbits SpA Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Lockbits SpA breach identified under incident ID LOCCYB1783614618.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Lockbits SpA's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lockbitscl, the number of followers: 886, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 4 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 674 and after the incident was 525 with a difference of -149 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Lockbits SpA and their customers.

On 01 July 2026, a cybersecurity incident called "Ransomware Surge in Q2 2026: U.S. and Germany Top Targets as AI Amplifies Threat Actor Tactics" came to light.

The U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing True.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as AI is increasingly used by threat actors to streamline existing tactics, such as data analysis and social engineering, rather than enabling novel attacks. The ransomware ecosystem is resilient, with a few high-volume groups dominating the landscape.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups increasingly targeted victims outside the U.S. and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating resilience of ransomware ecosystem with multiple groups. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware activity rose 7% quarter-over-quarter. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aI-generated negotiation messages to justify ransom demands. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating fulcrumSec leveraged AI to analyze stolen data and Data Staged: Local Data Staging (T1074.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration and encryption as key motivations. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration and 2,279 victims reported in Q2 2026. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption and ransomware strain activity confirmed and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating brand reputation impact and legal liabilities noted. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating resilience of ransomware groups absorbing affiliates and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aI-driven productivity gains for threat actors. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (60%)
Credential Access
Adversary-in-the-Middle (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Data Staged: Local Data Staging (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References