Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » LITENGA HOLDING LIMITED » LIT1768487630

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LIT1768487630)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-21
Company Score Before Incident815 / 1000
Company Score After Incident794 / 1000
Company LinkView LITENGA HOLDING LIMITED Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERLIT1768487630
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORCyberattack on Group laptops
DATA EXPOSEDClients, projects, customer and supplier...
INCIDENT DATE13/01/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of LITENGA HOLDING LIMITED's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts LITENGA HOLDING LIMITED Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the LITENGA HOLDING LIMITED breach identified under incident ID LIT1768487630.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of LITENGA HOLDING LIMITED's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/litenga-holding-limited, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Non-profit Organizations and the number of employees: 15 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 815 and after the incident was 794 with a difference of -21 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on LITENGA HOLDING LIMITED and their customers.

On 14 January 2026, Ju Teng International Holdings Limited disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Data Security Incident at Ju Teng International Holdings Limited".

Ju Teng International Holdings disclosed a data security incident after discovering a Dark Web post on 14 January 2026 offering access to information claimed to relate to its clients, projects, customer and supplier contacts, and product details, allegedly obtained via a cyber...

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Certain Group laptops, and exposing Clients, projects, customer and supplier contacts, and product details.

In response, and began remediation that includes Review and strengthen systems and server security.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Incident underscores growing cyber risks for listed manufacturers.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack targeting certain company laptops and Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack on Group laptops. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack on Group laptops. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive information...obtained via a cyberattack on laptops. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating client details, project records, customer and supplier contacts. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating dark Web post offering access to sensitive information and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating information offered on Dark Web. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating data security incident and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating dark Web post offering access to sensitive information. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploitation of Remote Services (50%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Defacement (30%)

Sources & References