Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD » LIN1790087374

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LIN1790087374)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-5
Company Score Before Incident746 / 1000
Company Score After Incident741 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLIN1790087374
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORVirtual Machine Escape
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE13/05/2025
STATUSPatched (upstream fix available)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD breach identified under incident ID LIN1790087374.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/linux-kernel-foundation, the number of followers: 17363, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 15 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 746 and after the incident was 741 with a difference of -5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kernel Foundation - Master Linux Kernel & LDD and their customers.

Linux Kernel (ARM64 KVM environments) recently reported "Critical Linux Kernel Vulnerability (CVE-2026-89775) Exposes ARM64 Virtualization to Host Escape Attacks", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A newly disclosed Linux kernel vulnerability, CVE-2026-89775, allows attackers to escape an ARM64 virtual machine (VM) and gain unauthorized access to the underlying host system.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting ARM64 virtualization environments (KVM/arm64 with nested virtualization enabled).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Disable nested virtualization where unnecessary; audit /dev/kvm permissions, and began remediation that includes Update to a patched kernel release (commit 8053393680d4).

The case underscores how Patched (upstream fix available), teams are taking away lessons such as Importance of timely patching for virtualization vulnerabilities; need for stricter permissions on /dev/kvm; risks of nested virtualization in multi-tenant environments, and recommending next steps like Update to the latest patched Linux kernel release (commit 8053393680d4), Disable nested virtualization where not required and Audit and restrict /dev/kvm permissions to prevent local privilege escalation, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Cloud providers and enterprises using ARM64 virtualization should apply patches immediately and review nested virtualization configurations.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating flaw affects KVM/arm64 environments with nested virtualization enabled and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating multi-tenant cloud infrastructure...permitting untrusted users to create VMs. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Escape to Host (T1611) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating allows attackers to escape an ARM64 virtual machine (VM) and gain unauthorized access to the underlying host system and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unprivileged local user could exploit the flaw to gain root privileges on the host. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stale memory access mappings exposed to malicious guests, bypassing traps or VM exits and Indicator Removal (T1066) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pseudo-TLB invalidation...skipped, leaving stale memory access mappings. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Hash (T1550.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating retain read/write access to freed host memory pages at fixed kernel addresses. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromising the isolation between guest and host systems and System Shutdown/Reboot (T1529) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential unauthorized host access in cloud deployments. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)
Privilege Escalation
Escape to Host (90%)
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (80%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (70%)
Indicator Removal (60%)
Lateral Movement
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Hash (50%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (70%)
System Shutdown/Reboot (40%)

Sources & References