Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Lincoln Financial » LINLIN1780936450

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LINLIN1780936450)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-63
Company Score Before Incident566 / 1000
Company Score After Incident503 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLINLIN1780936450
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDFinancial account details, Social Security...
INCIDENT DATE28/05/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Lincoln Financial's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Lincoln Financial Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Lincoln Financial breach identified under incident ID LINLIN1780936450.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Lincoln Financial's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lincolnfinancial, the number of followers: 123298, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 10731 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 566 and after the incident was 503 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Lincoln Financial and their customers.

On 02 June 2026, Lincoln Retirement Services Company LLC disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Lincoln Retirement Services Data Breach Exposing Financial and Personal Information".

Lincoln Retirement Services Company LLC, a subsidiary of Lincoln Financial Group, reported a data breach involving unauthorized access to sensitive personal information, including financial account details and Social Security numbers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Financial account details, Social Security numbers.

In response, and began remediation that includes Guidance on fraud alerts, security freezes, and credit monitoring, and stakeholders are being briefed through Consumer notification letters sent on 2026-05-29.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Contact Lincoln’s Customer Contact Center at 800-234-3500 (Monday–Friday, 8 a.m.–8 p.m. ET) for inquiries.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive personal information and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating details surrounding the breach...remain unclear. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to...financial account details and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating details surrounding the breach...remain unclear. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed financial account details and Social Security numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving unauthorized access to sensitive personal information and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating details surrounding the breach...remain unclear. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating details surrounding the breach...remain unclear and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating identity theft risk such as High. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Brute Force (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References