Comparison Overview
Liberty IT

Liberty IT
Adelaide Exchange, 24-26 Adelaide Street, Belfast, Co Antrim, GB, BT2 8GD
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We’re a bunch of inventors, problem solvers, business brains and tech transformers. We revel in a challenge and stop at nothing to provide the solution, exceeding expectations, breaking new ground and transforming customer interactions. With over 25 years’ experience w...

ServiceNow
2225 Lawson Lane, Santa Clara, 95054, US
Last Update: 09/09/2026
ServiceNow (NYSE: NOW) makes the world work better for everyone. Our cloud-based platform and solutions help digitize and unify organizations so that they can find smarter, faster, better ways to make work flow. So employees and customers can be more connected, more inn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Liberty IT







ServiceNow






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Liberty IT in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
ServiceNow has 579.61% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Liberty IT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Liberty IT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ServiceNow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ServiceNow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Liberty IT

ServiceNow
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.