Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LIB1764785693)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Liberty Resources's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Liberty Resources Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Liberty Resources breach identified under incident ID LIB1764785693.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Liberty Resources's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/liberty-resources, the number of followers: 2666, the industry type: Individual and Family Services and the number of employees: 727 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 689 and after the incident was 633 with a difference of -56 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Liberty Resources and their customers.
On 03 December 2025, Liberty Resources disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Liberty Resources Data Breach".
Liberty Resources, a health care provider based in Syracuse, New York, announced a cybersecurity incident where an unauthorized person gained access to its network and may have acquired records containing personally identifiable information (PII) including Social Security numb...
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), including Social Security numbers, medical information, health insurance information, and dates of birth.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing (Lynch Carpenter LLP investigation), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Individuals impacted may be entitled to compensation. Legal review available via Lynch Carpenter LLP.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized person gained access to Liberty’s network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident impacting Liberty’s network (no specific vector). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to network implies credential compromise. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating records containing PII (SSN, medical info, etc.) may have been acquired. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized person may have acquired PII records and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no specific exfil method, but PII was accessed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware details, but data breach implies impact and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating pII accessed; potential for misuse or alteration. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Liberty Resources Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/liberty-resources/incident/LIB1764785693
- Liberty Resources CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/liberty-resources
- Liberty Resources Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/lib1764785693-liberty-resources-breach-december-2025/
- Liberty Resources CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/liberty-resources/history
- Liberty Resources CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/12/03/3199236/0/en/Liberty-Resources-Data-Breach-Claims-Investigated-by-Lynch-Carpenter.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf