Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Liberty Group South AfricaLiberty Group South Africa
VS
AflacAflac
Liberty Group South Africa

Liberty Group South Africa

1 Ameshoff Street,, Braamfontein, 2001, ZA

Last Update: 17/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.liberty.co.za
588/1000Very Poor

At Liberty we believe that knowledge shared can change people's realities, every day. Since 1957 we’ve grown from being a South African life insurer to a Pan-African financial services company, offering asset management, investment and insurance solutions. We work wit...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:8,464
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Aflac

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.aflac.com
491/1000Critical

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:18,043
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Liberty Group South Africa

Liberty Group South Africa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aflac

Aflac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Liberty Group South Africa has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Aflac has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Liberty Group South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liberty Group South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Liberty Group South Africa

Liberty Group South Africa

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LIBSTA1776458526
Aflac

Aflac

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AFLJAGNUC1768389868
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL1768391547
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFL2462024101425

FAQ

Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa company and Aflac company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa and Aflac, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Liberty Group South Africa or Aflac ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Liberty Group South Africa or Aflac ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa and Aflac, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Liberty Group South Africa and Aflac, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA