Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Leidos Gibbs & CoxLeidos Gibbs & Cox
VS
Hapag-Lloyd AGHapag-Lloyd AG
Leidos Gibbs & Cox

Leidos Gibbs & Cox

N/A

Last Update: 11/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gibbscox.com
762/1000Fair

Leidos Gibbs & Cox is an engineering and design firm specializing naval architecture, marine engineering, and consulting engineering. The firm is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia with offices in New York City; Chesapeake, Virginia; Newport News, Virginia; New Orlean...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:397
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Ballindamm 25, Hamburg, DE, 20095

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hapag-lloyd.com
797/1000Fair

About Hapag-Lloyd With a fleet of 313 modern container ships and a total transport capacity of 2.5 million TEU, Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world’s leading liner shipping companies. In the Liner Shipping segment, the Company has around 14,000 employees and 400 offices in ...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:15,039
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Leidos Gibbs & Cox

Leidos Gibbs & Cox

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leidos Gibbs & Cox in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapag-Lloyd AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Leidos Gibbs & Cox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leidos Gibbs & Cox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hapag-Lloyd AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapag-Lloyd AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Leidos Gibbs & Cox

Leidos Gibbs & Cox

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAP508092125

FAQ

Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Leidos Gibbs & Cox or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Leidos Gibbs & Cox or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Leidos Gibbs & Cox and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8