Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Law360 » LAW1782161359

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LAW1782161359)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-18
Company Score Before Incident762 / 1000
Company Score After Incident744 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLAW1782161359
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORThird-party vendors, Remote work, Legal AI tools
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive client data
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Law360's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Law360 Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Law360 breach identified under incident ID LAW1782161359.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Law360's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/law360, the number of followers: 152752, the industry type: Online Audio and Video Media and the number of employees: 732 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 762 and after the incident was 744 with a difference of -18 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Law360 and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Small Law Firms Bear the Brunt of 2025’s Cyberattack Surge", has drawn attention.

In 2025, cyberattacks on law firms continued to escalate, with smaller practices emerging as the most frequent targets of data breaches.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive client data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating surge in breaches tied to third-party vendors, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating remote work...linked to security vulnerabilities, and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating legal AI tools with security vulnerabilities. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendors, remote work, legal AI tools. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive client data...highly confidential. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breaches...smaller practices emerging as most frequent targets. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating financial and reputational consequences and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating brand reputation impact such as Critical concern. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (80%)
External Remote Services (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Defacement (30%)

Sources & References