Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Latvijas valsts meži » LAT1783614703

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LAT1783614703)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-96
Company Score Before Incident757 / 1000
Company Score After Incident661 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLAT1783614703
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORUnpatched vulnerability
DATA EXPOSED44GB of data leaked
INCIDENT DATE24/06/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Latvijas valsts meži's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Latvijas valsts meži Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Latvijas valsts meži breach identified under incident ID LAT1783614703.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Latvijas valsts meži's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/latvijas-valsts-mezi, the number of followers: 6643, the industry type: Paper and Forest Product Manufacturing and the number of employees: 383 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 757 and after the incident was 661 with a difference of -96 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Latvijas valsts meži and their customers.

Latvijas Valsts Meži (LVM) recently reported "Latvia’s State Forestry Company Hit by Prolonged Ransomware Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Latvia’s state-owned forestry company, Latvijas Valsts Meži (LVM), is still recovering from a ransomware attack that disrupted its IT systems for weeks.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Mapping platform, Hunting application and Contractor communication systems, and exposing 44GB of data leaked.

In response, and began remediation that includes Full restoration in progress.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating breach exploited an unpatched vulnerability in a system. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched vulnerability in a system that had not been updated. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers had likely been inside LVM’s network for over a week. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched vulnerability in a system not updated for two years. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers had likely been inside LVM’s network for over a week and Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating digital certificates, cryptographic keys compromised. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating user credentials exposed in 44GB of stolen data and Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys (T1552.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating cryptographic keys compromised in the breach. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attackers accessed far more than they published and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 44GB of data leaked including internal documents, emails. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 44GB of data leaked including internal documents, emails and Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating emails compromised in the breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 44GB of data leaked by financially motivated group. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack disrupted IT systems for weeks and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating key services including mapping platform taken offline. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (70%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (90%)
Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys (80%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (70%)
File and Directory Discovery (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (60%)

Sources & References