Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Latitude Health » MINLAT1773852600

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MINLAT1773852600)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-35
Company Score Before Incident759 / 1000
Company Score After Incident724 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMINLAT1773852600
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED400,000 documents
INCIDENT DATE04/01/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Latitude Health's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Latitude Health Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Latitude Health breach identified under incident ID MINLAT1773852600.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Latitude Health's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/latitude-health-ai, the number of followers: 1238, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 10 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 759 and after the incident was 724 with a difference of -35 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Latitude Health and their customers.

Manage My Health recently reported "New Zealand’s Largest Health Portal Hit by Major Ransomware Attack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

New Zealand’s largest health portal, Manage My Health, suffered a significant cybersecurity incident after hackers stole over 400,000 documents from approximately 126,000 patients.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 400,000 documents, with nearly 400,000 documents records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Government review to assess security protections and identify improvements.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating new Zealand’s largest health portal, Manage My Health, suffered a significant cybersecurity incident and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating risks of supply chain attacks, where third-party vendors with weaker security become entry points. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack with data exfiltration and encryption threats. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attackers accessed 400,000 documents from 126,000 patients. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive patient data accessed, implying elevated privileges. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack with data exfiltration; likely used obfuscation and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating 2021 Waikato DHB breach involved outdated security (Windows XP). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating access to 400,000 documents suggests credential compromise and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare sector targeted; weak authentication risks noted. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 126,000 patients affected; likely targeted account discovery and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 400,000 documents stolen; implies extensive file discovery. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 400,000 documents stolen from Manage My Health portal and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating health portal likely used shared drives for patient records. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack with $60,000 demand implies C2 communication. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers stole 400,000 documents and threatened to release data and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration common in ransomware attacks. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack with $60,000 demand; implies encryption and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks often disable recovery options. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Trusted Relationship (50%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (50%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (40%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (40%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Brute Force (40%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (60%)
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (60%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Inhibit System Recovery (50%)