Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Lansing Community College » LAN1780691613

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LAN1780691613)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-75
Company Score Before Incident779 / 1000
Company Score After Incident704 / 1000
Company LinkView Lansing Community College Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERLAN1780691613
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORCompromised credentials
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information (names, addresses, dates...
INCIDENT DATE11/02/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Lansing Community College's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Lansing Community College Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Lansing Community College breach identified under incident ID LAN1780691613.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Lansing Community College's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lansing-community-college, the number of followers: 50288, the industry type: Higher Education and the number of employees: 1960 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 779 and after the incident was 704 with a difference of -75 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Lansing Community College and their customers.

On 05 June 2026, Lansing Community College disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Lansing Community College Data Breach".

Lansing Community College (LCC) reported a data breach involving unauthorized access to its network systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Network systems, and exposing Personal information (names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers).

In response, and began remediation that includes Secured network systems, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification to affected individuals, credit monitoring services offered.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 24 months of complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection services offered to affected individuals. Contact: 866-675-2006 (Monday–Friday, 9 a.m.–5:30 p.m. ET) or 866-659-7088 for inquiries.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor gained access on February 12, 2025, through compromised credentials. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating access was gained through compromised credentials. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included names, SSNs, driver’s license numbers, and other PII. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to network systems with high-sensitivity data exposed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to network systems with potential data exposure and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data integrity post-incident. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Credential Access
Compromise Accounts (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (50%)
Data Destruction (30%)

Sources & References