Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LaGuardia Gateway PartnersLaGuardia Gateway Partners
VS
KLM Royal Dutch AirlinesKLM Royal Dutch Airlines
LaGuardia Gateway Partners

LaGuardia Gateway Partners

LaGuardia Airport Terminal B , Flushing , 11371 , US

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://laguardiab.com
736/1000Moderate

Welcome to the new LaGuardia Terminal B. LaGuardia Gateway Partners (LGP) is the private organization selected by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to redevelop and manage LaGuardia Airport's Terminal B. In 2022, LaGuardia Gateway completed its historic $...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:107
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Amsterdamseweg 55, Amstelveen, 1182 GP, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://klmf.ly/R05uLo
731/1000Moderate

Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:22,827
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LaGuardia Gateway Partners

LaGuardia Gateway Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

LaGuardia Gateway Partners has 51.92% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KLM Royal Dutch Airlines in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LaGuardia Gateway Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LaGuardia Gateway Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LaGuardia Gateway Partners

LaGuardia Gateway Partners

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
O’HCITLAGHAR1780439746
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KLM304080925
🔒 Incident : Breach
KLM2289123

FAQ

Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners company and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LaGuardia Gateway Partners or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LaGuardia Gateway Partners or KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LaGuardia Gateway Partners and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2