Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LAFAMLAFAM
VS
Coles GroupColes Group
LAFAM

LAFAM

CARRERA 19 # 164 - 64 BOGOTA, Bogot√°, D.C. 571, CO

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lafam.com.co
757/1000Fair

Lafam pertenece al Grupo Essilor Luxottica líder en el cuidado visual en el mundo, ofrecemos un amplio portafolio de productos y servicios en optometría y oftalmología. Nuestra experiencia por más de 40 años nos permite brindar un proceso de ventas simple, transpar...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:201-500
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Coles Group

Coles Group

800-838 Toorak Rd, Melbourne, 3123, AU

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://colescareers.com.au/
796/1000Fair

Coles is one of Australia’s leading retailers, with an extensive footprint of over 1,800 retail outlets nationally. We employ more than 115,000 team members, engage with more than 8,000 suppliers, and we welcome millions of customers through our store network and digita...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,143
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LAFAM

LAFAM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coles Group

Coles Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LAFAM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coles Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LAFAM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LAFAM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coles Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coles Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LAFAM

LAFAM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Coles Group

Coles Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LAFAM company and Coles Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LAFAM and Coles Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LAFAM and Coles Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LAFAM or Coles Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LAFAM or Coles Group ?
Between LAFAM and Coles Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LAFAM and Coles Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9