Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LaBella AssociatesLaBella Associates
VS
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
LaBella Associates

LaBella Associates

300 State Street, Suite 201, Rochester, New York, US, 14614

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.labellapc.com
654/1000Weak

At LaBella Associates, our job is to create – structures, plans, ideas, results. As a nationally recognized Design Professional Corporation, that’s a given, right? But here’s what really drives us: creating partnership between our team and our clients. So much so that w...

NAICS:54131
NAICS Definition:Architectural Services
Employees:1,486
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

Building 3, Courtyard 5, Anding Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, CN

Last Update: 11/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cscec.com.cn/
801/1000Good

China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd (in short: China Construction; Stock code: 601668), formally established on December 10, 2007, was co-initiated by four Fortune Global 500 enterprises: China State Construction Engineering Corp. (CSCEC), China Nationa...

NAICS:54131
NAICS Definition:Architectural Services
Employees:37,099
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LaBella Associates

LaBella Associates

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LaBella Associates in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LaBella Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LaBella Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LaBella Associates

LaBella Associates

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LAB2092620111325
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LaBella Associates company and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LaBella Associates and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LaBella Associates and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LaBella Associates or CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LaBella Associates or CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) ?
Between LaBella Associates and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LaBella Associates and CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2