LaBella Associates
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
labella-associates-p-c-
Website:
Employees number:
1,486
Number of followers:
34,812
NAICS:
54131
Industry Type:
Homepage:
labellapc.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
LAB_1364048
Scan Status:
In-progress
LaBella Associates Company CyberSecurity Posture
labellapc.com
At LaBella Associates, our job is to create – structures, plans, ideas, results. As a nationally recognized Design Professional Corporation, that’s a given, right? But here’s what really drives us: creating partnership between our team and our clients. So much so that we become one team, unified in the unrelenting pursuit of exceptional on each and every project. Reliability. Accountability. Collaboration. Respect. Not skills we went to school for, but innate in LaBella team members. The pursuit of partnership is embedded in our culture—has been since our inception in 1978. And it affects client outcomes in profound ways. It means we’re built to expertly execute projects from start to finish. That we have the talent and resources to take on any challenge. That projects are completed on time, on budget, and beyond expectations. And that we win awards – not just for our talent, but also for our ethics, employee culture, and growth. Headquartered in Rochester, NY, LaBella is home to more than 2,000 multi-disciplinary consultants who plan, design, engineer, and manage public and private projects that enrich our communities. Our expertise is recognized in infrastructure, buildings, environmental, and energy projects throughout the eastern United States and Spain, with recent expansion into the United Kingdom. Across the breadth of LaBella’s disciplines and services, a legacy of exceptional quality and value are the common threads. Those outcomes are made possible by something even more foundational to our company and our culture—an enduring commitment to client partnership.
LaBella Associates A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
LaBella Associates Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 0 and 549
LaBella Associates
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
LaBella Associates Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
LaBella Associates
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
LaBella Associates Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
LaBella Associates
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: LaBella Associates, a New York-based architecture and engineering firm, suffered a **ransomware attack** by the **RHYSIDA group** in **March 2025**, detected after suspicious network activity. The breach, confirmed in October 2025, exposed **sensitive personal data** of **6,712 individuals**, including current and former employees. Compromised information included **names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver’s license/state ID numbers, and financial account details**. The attackers threatened to publish the stolen data on the **dark web** via the **Tor network**.The company disclosed the incident to the **Maine and Massachusetts Attorneys General** in November 2025 and notified affected individuals, offering **free credit monitoring (TransUnion Cyberscout)**. LaBella engaged a **third-party forensic team** to investigate and secure its network. The attack’s scale and the nature of the leaked data—**employee PII and financial records**—pose severe risks of **identity theft, fraud, and reputational damage**.
LaBella Associates
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: LaBella Associates, an architecture and planning firm headquartered in Rochester, New York, experienced a **data breach** on or around **March 24, 2025**, when the **ransomware group RHYSIDA** infiltrated its systems. The attackers accessed sensitive files, compromising **personally identifiable information (PII)** of at least **6,712 individuals**, including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver’s license/state ID numbers, and financial account details. The breach posed a severe risk of identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational harm. RHYSIDA threatened to publish the stolen data on the dark web, escalating the threat. Affected individuals were notified in **November 2025**, with offers of credit monitoring and legal recourse for potential compensation. The incident underscored vulnerabilities in the company’s cybersecurity, exposing employees and clients to long-term risks.
LaBella Associates Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for LaBella Associates
Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)
LaBella Associates has 198.51% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
LaBella Associates has 212.5% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types LaBella Associates vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)
LaBella Associates reported 2 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 2 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — LaBella Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LaBella Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
LaBella Associates Company Subsidiaries
At LaBella Associates, our job is to create – structures, plans, ideas, results. As a nationally recognized Design Professional Corporation, that’s a given, right? But here’s what really drives us: creating partnership between our team and our clients. So much so that we become one team, unified in the unrelenting pursuit of exceptional on each and every project. Reliability. Accountability. Collaboration. Respect. Not skills we went to school for, but innate in LaBella team members. The pursuit of partnership is embedded in our culture—has been since our inception in 1978. And it affects client outcomes in profound ways. It means we’re built to expertly execute projects from start to finish. That we have the talent and resources to take on any challenge. That projects are completed on time, on budget, and beyond expectations. And that we win awards – not just for our talent, but also for our ethics, employee culture, and growth. Headquartered in Rochester, NY, LaBella is home to more than 2,000 multi-disciplinary consultants who plan, design, engineer, and manage public and private projects that enrich our communities. Our expertise is recognized in infrastructure, buildings, environmental, and energy projects throughout the eastern United States and Spain, with recent expansion into the United Kingdom. Across the breadth of LaBella’s disciplines and services, a legacy of exceptional quality and value are the common threads. Those outcomes are made possible by something even more foundational to our company and our culture—an enduring commitment to client partnership.
Loading...
LaBella Associates Similar Companies
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd (in short: China Construction; Stock code: 601668), formally established on December 10, 2007, was co-initiated by four Fortune Global 500 enterprises: China State Construction Engineering Corp. (CSCEC), China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)
.png)
LaBella Associates CyberSecurity News
November 13, 2025 08:00 AM
Labella Associates Data Breach Investigation
If you were affected by the Labella Associates data breach, you may be entitled to compensation.
November 13, 2025 08:00 AM
LaBella Associates Data Breach Affects 6,712 People
Data breach at LaBella Associates affects 6712, exposing names. No misuse reported yet.
February 05, 2025 08:00 AM
DCC Announces 2025 Black History Month Lineup
POUGHKEEPSIE – Dutchess Community College has announced an engaging series of events to celebrate Black History Month.
November 15, 2021 08:00 AM
Award of Merit Higher Ed/Research: Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Global Cybersecurity Institute
Situated in the center of campus, the three-story, 50000-sq-ft building houses classrooms, instructional and research labs, simulation and...
April 07, 2021 07:00 AM
Architects of RIT’s Global Cybersecurity Institute embrace intrigue
RIT's new 51,000-square-foot Global Cybersecurity Institute, a design-build partnership between LaBella and LeChase Construction Services...
July 16, 2020 07:00 AM
Jim Yarrington ‒ Rochester Institute of Technology
Munson appointed long-time architect and RIT's Planning and Design Director Jim Yarrington to chair a diverse committee to explore the idea.
June 30, 2020 07:00 AM
RIT offers Cybersecurity Bootcamp to help people get back to work and start new careers
Update: As of January 1, 2023, this program has transitioned to RIT Certified. A new 15-week program at Rochester Institute of Technology is...
August 06, 2019 07:00 AM
Global Cybersecurity Institute to open in 2020
A new facility at RIT will help the university increase enrollment in cybersecurity, advance research and create more opportunities for industry and government...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
LaBella Associates CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of LaBella Associates
The official website of LaBella Associates is http://www.labellapc.com.
LaBella Associates’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, LaBella Associates’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 489, reflecting their Critical security posture.
How many security badges does LaBella Associates’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, LaBella Associates currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does LaBella Associates have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, LaBella Associates is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does LaBella Associates have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, LaBella Associates does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does LaBella Associates comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, LaBella Associates is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does LaBella Associates have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, LaBella Associates does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does LaBella Associates comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, LaBella Associates is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does LaBella Associates have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,LaBella Associates is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of LaBella Associates
LaBella Associates operates primarily in the Architecture and Planning industry.
Number of Employees at LaBella Associates
LaBella Associates employs approximately 1,486 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by LaBella Associates
LaBella Associates presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
LaBella Associates’s LinkedIn Followers
LaBella Associates’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 34,812 followers.
NAICS Classification of LaBella Associates
LaBella Associates is classified under the NAICS code 54131, which corresponds to Architectural Services.
LaBella Associates’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, LaBella Associates does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
LaBella Associates’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, LaBella Associates maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/labella-associates-p-c-.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving LaBella Associates
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that LaBella Associates has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
LaBella Associates has an estimated 9,824 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at LaBella Associates ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.
How does LaBella Associates detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with forensic investigation team, and containment measures with secured network, and communication strategy with disclosure to maine and massachusetts attorneys general (2025-11-12), communication strategy with mail notifications to impacted individuals (2025-11-12), and and remediation measures with offered free transunion cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services to affected individuals, and communication strategy with sent breach notification letters to affected individuals on 2025-11-12, communication strategy with public investigation by shamis & gentile p.a. for class action claims..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: LaBella Associates Data Breach (2025)
Description: A major architecture and engineering firm, LaBella Associates, experienced a ransomware attack by the RHYSIDA group, leading to the potential exposure of sensitive personal data of current and former employees. The breach was detected on March 24, 2025, and investigated until October 13, 2025. The compromised data included PII such as names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and financial account information. The company disclosed the incident to regulatory authorities and offered credit monitoring services to affected individuals.
Date Detected: 2025-03-24
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-12
Type: data breach
Threat Actor: RHYSIDA
Motivation: financial (ransomware)
Title: LaBella Associates Data Breach and Ransomware Attack
Description: LaBella Associates, an architecture and planning firm, experienced a data breach on or around March 24, 2025. A threat actor (hacking group RHYSIDA) gained unauthorized access to the company's computer environment, potentially exposing sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) of at least 6,712 individuals in the U.S. The breach involved ransomware, with threats to publish stolen data on the dark web. Affected individuals were notified via mail on November 12, 2025.
Date Detected: 2025-03-24
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: RHYSIDA
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftExtortion
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Ransomware.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Social security numbers, Driver's license or state id numbers, Financial account information
Systems Affected: internal network
Brand Reputation Impact: potential damage (data leak threat on dark web)
Identity Theft Risk: high (PII exposed)
Payment Information Risk: high (financial account information exposed)
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Brand Reputation Impact: High (potential reputational damage due to exposure of sensitive PII and ransomware threats)
Legal Liabilities: Potential (class action lawsuits and compensation claims initiated by Shamis & Gentile P.A.)
Identity Theft Risk: High (exposure of SSNs, driver's license numbers, and financial account information)
Payment Information Risk: High (financial account information compromised)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Financial Data, , First And Last Name, Date Of Birth, Social Security Number (Ssn), Driver'S License Or State Id Number, Financial Account Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Entity Name: LaBella Associates
Entity Type: private company
Industry: architecture and engineering
Location: New York, USA (HQ)
Customers Affected: 6,712 individuals (including 179 in Maine and 30 in Massachusetts)
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Entity Name: LaBella Associates
Entity Type: Private Company
Industry: Architecture, Engineering, Energy, Infrastructure, Environmental Consulting
Location: Rochester, New York, USA
Size: 1,200+ employees
Customers Affected: 6,712 individuals (including 179 in Maine and 30 in Massachusetts)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Forensic Investigation Team.
Containment Measures: secured network
Communication Strategy: disclosure to Maine and Massachusetts Attorneys General (2025-11-12)mail notifications to impacted individuals (2025-11-12)
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Remediation Measures: Offered free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services to affected individuals
Communication Strategy: Sent breach notification letters to affected individuals on 2025-11-12Public investigation by Shamis & Gentile P.A. for class action claims
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through forensic investigation team, .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data
Number of Records Exposed: 6,712
Sensitivity of Data: high (includes SSN, financial account info)
Data Exfiltration: claimed by RHYSIDA (threatened dark web leak)
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Type of Data Compromised: First and last name, Date of birth, Social security number (ssn), Driver's license or state id number, Financial account information
Number of Records Exposed: 6,712
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes PII and financial data)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Offered free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services to affected individuals, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by secured network and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney General (2025-11-12)Massachusetts Attorney General (2025-11-12)
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Legal Actions: Class action investigation by Shamis & Gentile P.A. for compensation claims,
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Class action investigation by Shamis & Gentile P.A. for compensation claims, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Recommendations: Enroll in offered TransUnion Cybersout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Monitor credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activityEnroll in offered TransUnion Cybersout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Monitor credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activity
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Recommendations: Enroll in free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity, Place a fraud alert on credit reports, Request free annual credit reports from major bureaus, Seek legal assistance for potential compensation claimsEnroll in free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity, Place a fraud alert on credit reports, Request free annual credit reports from major bureaus, Seek legal assistance for potential compensation claimsEnroll in free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity, Place a fraud alert on credit reports, Request free annual credit reports from major bureaus, Seek legal assistance for potential compensation claimsEnroll in free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity, Place a fraud alert on credit reports, Request free annual credit reports from major bureaus, Seek legal assistance for potential compensation claimsEnroll in free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity, Place a fraud alert on credit reports, Request free annual credit reports from major bureaus, Seek legal assistance for potential compensation claims
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Source: Maine Attorney General Breach Notice
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Source: Massachusetts Attorney General Breach Notice
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Source: Shamis & Gentile P.A. (Class Action Investigation)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Maine Attorney General Breach Notice, and Source: Massachusetts Attorney General Breach Notice, and Source: Shamis & Gentile P.A. (Class Action Investigation).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Investigation Status: completed (2025-10-13)
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (class action investigation by Shamis & Gentile P.A.)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Disclosure To Maine And Massachusetts Attorneys General (2025-11-12), Mail Notifications To Impacted Individuals (2025-11-12), Sent Breach Notification Letters To Affected Individuals On 2025-11-12 and Public Investigation By Shamis & Gentile P.A. For Class Action Claims.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
Customer Advisories: Mail notifications sent to impacted individuals (2025-11-12)Offer of free TransUnion Cybersout credit monitoring and fraud assistance
Incident : Data Breach LAB1592815111325
Customer Advisories: Breach notification letters sent on 2025-11-12Offer of free credit monitoring and fraud assistance (TransUnion Cyberscout)Guidance on fraud alerts, credit reports, and legal rights
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Mail Notifications Sent To Impacted Individuals (2025-11-12), Offer Of Free Transunion Cybersout Credit Monitoring And Fraud Assistance, , Breach Notification Letters Sent On 2025-11-12, Offer Of Free Credit Monitoring And Fraud Assistance (Transunion Cyberscout), Guidance On Fraud Alerts, Credit Reports, And Legal Rights and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : data breach LAB2092620111325
High Value Targets: Employee Pii,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Employee Pii,
Post-Incident Analysis
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Forensic Investigation Team, .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an RHYSIDA and RHYSIDA.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-03-24.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-11-12.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were personally identifiable information (PII), names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver's license or state ID numbers, financial account information, and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was internal network.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was forensic investigation team, .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was secured network.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Social Security numbers, driver's license or state ID numbers, addresses, financial account information, names, dates of birth and personally identifiable information (PII).
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 13.4K.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Class action investigation by Shamis & Gentile P.A. for compensation claims, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Seek legal assistance for potential compensation claims, Enroll in free TransUnion Cyberscout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Enroll in offered TransUnion Cybersout credit monitoring and fraud assistance services, Place a fraud alert on credit reports, Request free annual credit reports from major bureaus, Monitor credit reports and financial accounts for suspicious activity and Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Maine Attorney General Breach Notice, Shamis & Gentile P.A. (Class Action Investigation) and Massachusetts Attorney General Breach Notice.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is completed (2025-10-13).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Mail notifications sent to impacted individuals (2025-11-12)Offer of free TransUnion Cybersout credit monitoring and fraud assistance, Breach notification letters sent on 2025-11-12Offer of free credit monitoring and fraud assistance (TransUnion Cyberscout)Guidance on fraud alerts, credit reports and and legal rights.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
Description
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Description
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=labella-associates-p-c-' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
