Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Labcorp » LAB1790281763

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LAB1790281763)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-89
Company Score Before Incident630 / 1000
Company Score After Incident541 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLAB1790281763
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party vendor compromise
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and sensitive information
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2019
STATUSResolved (settlement reached)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Labcorp's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Labcorp Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Labcorp breach identified under incident ID LAB1790281763.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Labcorp's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/labcorp, the number of followers: 807344, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 42956 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 630 and after the incident was 541 with a difference of -89 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Labcorp and their customers.

Labcorp recently reported "Labcorp Settles Multistate Data Breach Investigation Over 2019 AMCA Incident", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Labcorp settled a multistate investigation into a 2019 data breach at Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau (AMCA), its debt collection vendor.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and sensitive information, with nearly 27.5 million individuals records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $2.29 million (settlement payment).

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and began remediation that includes Enhanced vendor security measures, data sharing minimization, vendor risk management program expansion.

The case underscores how Resolved (settlement reached), teams are taking away lessons such as Risks of third-party vendor management in cybersecurity; companies remain responsible for safeguarding customer data even when outsourcing operations, and recommending next steps like Implement enhanced vendor security measures, minimize data sharing with vendors, expand vendor risk management programs, apply specialized requirements for debt collectors, and hire third-party assessors for security evaluations.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating breach occurred at AMCA, Labcorp’s debt collection vendor and Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor compromise (AMCA) exposed Labcorp patient data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal and sensitive information of 27.5M individuals compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal and sensitive information...exposed via third-party vendor. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 27.5 million individuals’ data exposed in breach and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor (AMCA) handled sensitive data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating identity theft risk for affected individuals and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating brand reputation impact noted in settlement. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Compromise Software Supply Chain (80%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (50%)
Defacement (40%)