Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Kyuden International Corporation » KYU1781281967

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KYU1781281967)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-110
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident643 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERKYU1781281967
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORPhysical Loss/Theft
DATA EXPOSED10.9 million customer records
INCIDENT DATE26/04/2026
STATUSOngoing (drive unrecovered, no evidence of data leakage)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Kyuden International Corporation's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Kyuden International Corporation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kyuden International Corporation breach identified under incident ID KYU1781281967.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kyuden International Corporation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kyuden-international-corporation, the number of followers: 9475, the industry type: Utilities and the number of employees: 51 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 643 with a difference of -110 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kyuden International Corporation and their customers.

On 08 June 2026, Kyushu Electric Power Transmission and Distribution Co. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Kyushu Electric Power Data Breach Exposes 10.9 Million Customer Records in Japan’s Largest-Ever Breach".

Kyushu Electric Power Transmission and Distribution Co.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Backup storage system, and exposing 10.9 million customer records, with nearly 10.9 million records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Investigation ongoing, drive remains unrecovered, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications to regulators (PIPC, METI) and pending customer notifications.

The case underscores how Ongoing (drive unrecovered, no evidence of data leakage), teams are taking away lessons such as Physical security of data storage media is as critical as cybersecurity defenses. Unencrypted backup media and unlocked storage cabinets pose severe risks, even in biometrically secured environments. Subcontractors and business partners are significant sources of security incidents in Japan, and recommending next steps like Enforce encryption for all portable backup media as per NIST SP 800-209, Implement stricter physical access controls and auditing for storage areas and Enhance third-party risk management for contractors and subcontractors, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Regulatory notifications submitted to PIPC and METI. Customer notifications pending.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating contractor copied customer database onto SSD due to insufficient server storage. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unencrypted SSD contained sensitive customer data including names, addresses. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating backup procedure copied 10.9M customer records onto unencrypted SSD and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sSD stored in server room with 57 individuals from 10 firms accessing it. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Physical Medium: Exfiltration over USB (T1052.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating palm-sized SSD went missing from unlocked cabinet in server room and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data leakage, but physical loss enables potential exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating sSD remains unrecovered, data integrity at risk and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unencrypted SSD with 10.9M records poses high identity theft risk. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unencrypted backup media violates NIST SP 800-209 encryption requirements and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall (T1562.007) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating lack of auditing for physical access to storage areas. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploitation of Remote Services (30%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Physical Medium: Exfiltration over USB (70%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (20%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Cloud Firewall (30%)

Sources & References