Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.
VS
PanasonicPanasonic
KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.

KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.

Lyon Way, Frimley, Surrey , undefined, GU16 7ER, GB

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://uk.kyocera.com/
749/1000Moderate

Sales office in the UK. Kyocera has been successful in Europe for over 50 years. From its European headquarters in Esslingen am Neckar, KYOCERA Europe GmbH operates 26 sites including manufacturing facilities, with products ranging from fine ceramics, electronics, autom...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Panasonic

Panasonic

Ooaza Kadoma, 1006, Kadoma-shi, 571-8501, JP

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Founded in 1918, and today a global leader in developing innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, devices, B2B solutions and energy sectors worldwide, the Panasonic Group switched to an operating company s...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:29,888
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.

KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Panasonic

Panasonic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panasonic in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Panasonic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panasonic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.

KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Panasonic

Panasonic

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PAN356060525
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAN1349111122
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PAN02215422

FAQ

Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. company and Panasonic company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. and Panasonic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. and Panasonic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. or Panasonic ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. or Panasonic ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. and Panasonic, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between KYOCERA Fineceramics Ltd. and Panasonic, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9