Panasonic
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
panasonic
Employees number:
28,891
Number of followers:
300,667
NAICS:
335
Industry Type:
Homepage:
holdings.panasonic
IP Addresses:
40
Company ID:
PAN_1245118
Scan Status:
Completed
Panasonic Company CyberSecurity Posture
holdings.panasonic
Founded in 1918, and today a global leader in developing innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors worldwide, the Panasonic Group switched to an operating company system on April 1, 2022 with Panasonic Holdings Corporation serving as a holding company and eight companies positioned under its umbrella. The Group reported consolidated net sales of 8,496.4 billion yen for the year ended March 31, 2024.
Panasonic A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Panasonic Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
Panasonic
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Panasonic Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Panasonic
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Panasonic Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
3
Panasonic
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Tech giant Panasonic suffereed a data breach incident during June 2021 to November 2021 after its file server were accessed by an unauthorised party. The hackers infiltrated the servers and accessed sensitive data of job candidates including personal details of the candidates and other business-related information. This was the second incident with Panasonic after attackers had already released 4GB of data they had stolen from Panasonic India in November 2020.
Panasonic
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Japanese electronics giant Panasonic suffered from a major security breach after an unidentified threat actor had gained access to its internal network. An internal investigation revealed that the breach had gained access to some information on a file server. The compromised information includes sensitive customer details, employee personal information, Panasonic technical files from the company’s domestic operations. They investigated the incident and took preventive steps.
Panasonic
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: Panasonic Canada was targeted by the Conti ransomware group recently in February 2021. The attack affected the company's systems, processes, and networks. The firm immediately investigated the incident and contained the malware, cleaned and restored servers, and rebuilt its applications.
Panasonic
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Panasonic fell victim to subdomain hijacking by the Hazy Hawk threat group, which exploited misconfigured DNS records to spread malware and perpetrate online scams. The attackers redirected users to malicious sites through abandoned cloud resources, compromising user trust and exposing them to fraudulent activities. The attack emphasizes the critical importance of DNS hygiene and automated monitoring to detect and mitigate such vulnerabilities.
Panasonic Avionics Corporation
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Panasonic Avionics Corporation on December 22, 2023. The breach, identified on December 30, 2022, involved unauthorized access to systems occurring around December 14, 2022, potentially affecting personal information, including names, contact details, and Social Security numbers. The number of affected individuals is currently unknown.
Panasonic Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Panasonic
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)
Panasonic has 56.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Panasonic has 56.25% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Panasonic vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Panasonic reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 1 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Panasonic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Panasonic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Panasonic Company Subsidiaries
Founded in 1918, and today a global leader in developing innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors worldwide, the Panasonic Group switched to an operating company system on April 1, 2022 with Panasonic Holdings Corporation serving as a holding company and eight companies positioned under its umbrella. The Group reported consolidated net sales of 8,496.4 billion yen for the year ended March 31, 2024.
Loading...
Panasonic Similar Companies
Volex is a global leader in integrated manufacturing for performance-critical applications and a supplier of power products. We serve a diverse range of markets and customers, with particular expertise in cable assemblies, higher-level assemblies, data centre power and connectivity, electric vehic
Sanmina
Sanmina Corporation (Nasdaq: SANM) is a leading integrated manufacturing solutions provider serving the fastest-growing segments of the global Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS) market. Recognized as a technology leader, Sanmina Corporationprovides end-to-end manufacturing solutions, deliverin
Delta Electronics
Delta is a global innovative provider of switching power supplies and DC brushless fans, as well as a major source for power management solutions, components, visual displays, industrial automation, networking products, and renewable energy solutions. Delta Group has sales offices worldwide and manu
Galanz
Galanz Enterprises, founded in September 28th, 1978, is a world-class integrated white goods brand enterprise, and one of the most influential leading enterprises in the Chinese household electrical appliances industry. Galanz has the world's largest microwave oven R&D and manufacturing center, as
Signify
Signify (Euronext: LIGHT) is the world leader in lighting for professionals, consumers, and the Internet of Things. Our Philips products, Interact systems and data-enabled services deliver business value and transform life in homes, buildings and public spaces. In 2023, we had sales of EUR 6.7 billi
Eaton
Eaton is an intelligent power management company dedicated to improving the quality of life and protecting the environment for people everywhere. We are guided by our commitment to do business right, to operate sustainably and to help our customers manage power ─ today and well into the future. By c
TE Connectivity is a global industrial technology leader creating a safer, sustainable, productive, and connected future. Our broad range of connectivity and sensor solutions enable the distribution of power, signal and data to advance next-generation transportation, renewable energy, automated fact
Jabil
At Jabil (NYSE: JBL), we are proud to be a trusted partner for the world's top brands, offering comprehensive engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain solutions. With over 50 years of experience across industries and a vast network of over 100 sites worldwide, Jabil combines global reach with lo
Vertiv
Vertiv (NYSE: VRT) brings together hardware, software, analytics and ongoing services to enable its customers’ vital applications to run continuously, perform optimally and grow with their business needs. Vertiv solves the most important challenges facing today’s data centers, communication networks
.png)
Panasonic CyberSecurity News
November 13, 2025 05:55 AM
Panasonic launches next-gen VERZEUSE series to secure vehicles
Press Release, 13 November 2025. Panasonic Holdings Corporation has unveiled an upgraded version of its VERZEUSE cybersecurity platform,...
November 12, 2025 05:00 AM
VERZEUSE Series Evolves to Support SDV Architecture : Delivering Automotive Cyber Security that Protects the Entire Vehicle Life Cycle in the Cockpit HPC Era
PRNewswire/ -- Panasonic Automotive Systems Co., Ltd. (Headquarters: Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan; President: Masashi Nagayasu;...
November 11, 2025 05:10 AM
Stratasys unveils new materials and print capabilities
Stratasys announced updates across FDM, SAF, SLA and DLP platforms with new materials and faster printing capabilities.
October 29, 2025 07:00 AM
Panasonic ShinobiPro 4K MiniLED TV review: Big-screen entertainment
Reviews News: Panasonic's new 65-inch ShinobiPro 4K Mini LED Google TV impresses with its vibrant Mini LED display, offering deep blacks and...
October 27, 2025 07:00 AM
Panasonic Aligns Wireless Modules With New EU Cybersecurity Rules
Wireless security rules tighten in Europe as Panasonic moves early to certify its modules, preparing customers for tougher cybersecurity...
October 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Panasonic Confirms EU Compliance for Wireless Module Standards
Panasonic Industry Europe confirms wireless modules comply with EN 18031-1:2024, meeting new EU cybersecurity standards.
October 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Panasonic Wireless Modules Meet New EU Radio Standard
Panasonic Industry Europe is pleased to confirm alignment of its wireless modules with the newly adopted European RED EN 18031-1:2024.
September 29, 2025 07:00 AM
Windows 10 EOL: Panasonic warns UK firms of rising security risks
Microsoft will officially end support for Windows 10 on October 14, 2025. With the UK excluded from Microsoft's free Extended Security...
September 01, 2025 07:00 AM
Panasonic TOUGHBOOK to Showcase Mission-Ready Defense Solutions at DSEI 2025
Panasonic TOUGHBOOK to showcase cutting-edge military solutions at Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI)
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Panasonic CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Panasonic
The official website of Panasonic is https://holdings.panasonic/global/.
Panasonic’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Panasonic’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 736, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Panasonic’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Panasonic currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Panasonic have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Panasonic is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Panasonic have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Panasonic does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Panasonic comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Panasonic is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Panasonic have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Panasonic does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Panasonic comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Panasonic is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Panasonic have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Panasonic is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Panasonic
Panasonic operates primarily in the Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing industry.
Number of Employees at Panasonic
Panasonic employs approximately 28,891 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Panasonic
Panasonic presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Panasonic’s LinkedIn Followers
Panasonic’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 300,667 followers.
NAICS Classification of Panasonic
Panasonic is classified under the NAICS code 335, which corresponds to Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing.
Panasonic’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Panasonic has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/panasonic.
Panasonic’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Panasonic maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/panasonic.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Panasonic
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Panasonic has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Panasonic has an estimated 9,144 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Panasonic ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability, Breach and Ransomware.
How does Panasonic detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with contained the malware, and remediation measures with cleaned and restored servers, remediation measures with rebuilt its applications, and remediation measures with preventive steps..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Panasonic Canada Ransomware Attack
Description: Panasonic Canada was targeted by the Conti ransomware group in February 2021. The attack affected the company's systems, processes, and networks. The firm immediately investigated the incident and contained the malware, cleaned and restored servers, and rebuilt its applications.
Date Detected: February 2021
Type: Ransomware
Threat Actor: Conti ransomware group
Title: Panasonic Data Breach Incident
Description: Tech giant Panasonic suffered a data breach incident during June 2021 to November 2021 after its file server was accessed by an unauthorised party. The hackers infiltrated the servers and accessed sensitive data of job candidates including personal details of the candidates and other business-related information. This was the second incident with Panasonic after attackers had already released 4GB of data they had stolen from Panasonic India in November 2020.
Date Detected: June 2021
Date Resolved: November 2021
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to File Server
Title: Panasonic Security Breach
Description: Japanese electronics giant Panasonic suffered from a major security breach after an unidentified threat actor had gained access to its internal network. An internal investigation revealed that the breach had gained access to some information on a file server. The compromised information includes sensitive customer details, employee personal information, Panasonic technical files from the company’s domestic operations. They investigated the incident and took preventive steps.
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: Unidentified
Title: Hazy Hawk Subdomain Hijacking Campaign
Description: Hazy Hawk exploits misconfigured DNS CNAME records to hijack subdomains of major organizations and spread malware and scams.
Type: Subdomain Hijacking
Attack Vector: Misconfigured DNS CNAME records
Vulnerability Exploited: Dangling DNS records
Threat Actor: Hazy Hawk
Motivation: Spread malware and perpetrate online scams
Title: Panasonic Avionics Corporation Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Panasonic Avionics Corporation on December 22, 2023. The breach, identified on December 30, 2022, involved unauthorized access to systems occurring around December 14, 2022, potentially affecting personal information, including names, contact details, and Social Security numbers. The number of affected individuals is currently unknown.
Date Detected: 2022-12-30
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-12-22
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Dangling DNS records.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware PAN02215422
Systems Affected: systemsprocessesnetworks
Incident : Data Breach PAN224119422
Data Compromised: Personal details of job candidates, Business-related information
Systems Affected: File Server
Incident : Data Breach PAN1349111122
Data Compromised: Sensitive customer details, Employee personal information, Panasonic technical files
Systems Affected: File server
Incident : Data Breach PAN242072725
Data Compromised: Names, Contact details, Social security numbers
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Details Of Job Candidates, Business-Related Information, , Sensitive Customer Details, Employee Personal Information, Panasonic Technical Files, , Personal Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware PAN02215422
Entity Name: Panasonic Canada
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Electronics
Location: Canada
Incident : Data Breach PAN224119422
Entity Name: Panasonic
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Breach PAN1349111122
Entity Name: Panasonic
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Electronics
Location: Japan
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Entity Name: Bose
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Consumer Electronics
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Entity Name: Panasonic
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Consumer Electronics
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Entity Name: US CDC
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Health
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Entity Name: Deloitte
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Professional Services
Incident : Data Breach PAN242072725
Entity Name: Panasonic Avionics Corporation
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Aviation
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Ransomware PAN02215422
Containment Measures: contained the malware
Remediation Measures: cleaned and restored serversrebuilt its applications
Incident : Data Breach PAN1349111122
Remediation Measures: Preventive steps
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach PAN224119422
Type of Data Compromised: Personal details of job candidates, Business-related information
Incident : Data Breach PAN1349111122
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive customer details, Employee personal information, Panasonic technical files
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach PAN242072725
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesContact DetailsSocial Security Numbers
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: cleaned and restored servers, rebuilt its applications, , Preventive steps, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by contained the malware.
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Ransomware PAN02215422
Ransomware Strain: Conti
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Lessons Learned: Organizations must focus on DNS hygiene, using automated DNS monitoring tools, and treating misconfigurations as critical vulnerabilities.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Recommendations: Individuals should refuse push notification requests from unfamiliar sites and organizations should use automated DNS monitoring tools integrated with threat intelligence.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Organizations must focus on DNS hygiene, using automated DNS monitoring tools, and treating misconfigurations as critical vulnerabilities.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Individuals should refuse push notification requests from unfamiliar sites and organizations should use automated DNS monitoring tools integrated with threat intelligence..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Source: TechRadar Pro
Incident : Data Breach PAN242072725
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2023-12-22
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: TechRadar Pro, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2023-12-22.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PAN1349111122
Investigation Status: Completed
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Entry Point: Dangling DNS records
High Value Targets: Bose, Panasonic, Us Cdc, Deloitte,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Bose, Panasonic, Us Cdc, Deloitte,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Subdomain Hijacking PAN356060525
Root Causes: Administrative oversight leading to misconfigured DNS CNAME records
Corrective Actions: Automated DNS monitoring and treating misconfigurations as critical vulnerabilities
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Automated DNS monitoring and treating misconfigurations as critical vulnerabilities.
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Conti ransomware group, Unidentified and Hazy Hawk.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on February 2021.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-12-22.
What was the most recent incident resolved ?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on November 2021.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal details of job candidates, Business-related information, , Sensitive customer details, Employee personal information, Panasonic technical files, , Names, Contact Details, Social Security Numbers and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was systemsprocessesnetworks and File Server and File server.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was contained the malware.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Social Security Numbers, Business-related information, Sensitive customer details, Personal details of job candidates, Panasonic technical files, Employee personal information, Contact Details and Names.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Organizations must focus on DNS hygiene, using automated DNS monitoring tools, and treating misconfigurations as critical vulnerabilities.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Individuals should refuse push notification requests from unfamiliar sites and organizations should use automated DNS monitoring tools integrated with threat intelligence..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are California Office of the Attorney General and TechRadar Pro.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Completed.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Dangling DNS records.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=panasonic' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
