Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Kopran Ltd » KOPGLE1777473227

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KOPGLE1777473227)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-162
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident593 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERKOPGLE1777473227
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED237,747 records breached in confirmed...
INCIDENT DATE26/04/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Kopran Ltd's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Kopran Ltd Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kopran Ltd breach identified under incident ID KOPGLE1777473227.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kopran Ltd's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kopran-ltd, the number of followers: 5544, the industry type: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and the number of employees: 404 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 593 with a difference of -162 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kopran Ltd and their customers.

University of Mississippi Medical Center recently reported "Ransomware Surge in Healthcare: Q1 2026 Attacks Highlight Persistent Threats", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

The first quarter of 2026 saw 201 ransomware attacks targeting the healthcare sector, with 120 directed at hospitals, clinics, and providers, and 81 at related businesses including pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical billing firms, and healthcare tech companies.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Healthcare systems, billing systems, medical devices, recruitment platforms, pharmaceutical data, and exposing 237,747 records breached in confirmed attacks (providers); 29 TB allegedly stolen from businesses, 13 TB from providers, with nearly 237,747 (confirmed providers); 131,700 (Nippon Medical School); 92,000 (Hospital Caribbean Medical Center) records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Healthcare sector remains a prime target due to high-value data and operational vulnerabilities. Disparities in reporting due to national disclosure laws may skew attack figures.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sector remains a prime target due to...operational vulnerabilities, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating billing and shipment delays after...attack (UFP Technologies), and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high-profile breaches included...where data was compromised. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains encrypted data (e.g., Qilin, LockBit) and Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare systems...affected by ransomware strains. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating billing systems, medical devices...affected (UFP Technologies). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating high-value data and operational vulnerabilities. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (e.g., Qilin, LockBit) encrypted data and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating clinic closures, billing delays (University of Mississippi Medical Center). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 131,700 records exposed (Nippon Medical School) and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII, medical records, financial data compromised. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery: Domain Account (T1087.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 29 TB of data allegedly stolen from businesses and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 1.8 TB of data lost (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating billing systems, medical devices affected (UFP Technologies). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 237,747 records breached; 29 TB stolen from businesses and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 13 TB of data allegedly stolen from providers. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (e.g., Qilin, LockBit) active in attacks. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 29 TB of data allegedly stolen from businesses and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 1.8 TB lost (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals); 284 GB stolen (Kopran Ltd). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains encrypted data (e.g., Qilin, LockBit), Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating clinic closures for weeks (University of Mississippi Medical Center), and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 1.8 TB of data lost (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (40%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (50%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery: Domain Account (60%)
File and Directory Discovery (50%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (70%)
Data Destruction (50%)