Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LASKLU1782319113)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Klue's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Klue Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Klue breach identified under incident ID LASKLU1782319113.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Klue's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/klue, the number of followers: 32457, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 199 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 522 and after the incident was 457 with a difference of -65 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Klue and their customers.
On 11 June 2024, LastPass disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "LastPass Warns Users of Third-Party Breach Exposing Personal Data".
LastPass has notified customers that their personal information was compromised in a June 11 breach of Klue, a third-party market intelligence firm.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Klue (third-party market intelligence firm), and exposing Personal information (names, phone numbers, email and physical addresses, support case and sales-related records).
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Customer notifications.
The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Warnings about phishing and social engineering risks.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including third-party breach of Klue, a market intelligence firm, and supply chain such as true. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Compromise Accounts (T1586) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including support case and sales-related records compromised, and pII exposed increases phishing risk. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, phone numbers, email/physical addresses, support/sales records stolen. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including icarus claimed responsibility; data exfiltration confirmed, and motivation such as Data exfiltration, extortion and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threats to leak data suggest dark web or public exposure. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including brand reputation impact such as Yes, and legal liabilities such as Yes (UK ICO fine) and Financial Theft (T1657) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ripple co-founder lost $150M in crypto after 2022 breach. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Org Information (T1591) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating market intelligence firm (Klue) targeted for PII/sales data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Klue Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/klue/incident/LASKLU1782319113
- Klue CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/klue
- Klue Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/lasklu1782319113-klue-lastpass-breach-june-2026/
- Klue CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/klue/history
- Klue CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://protos.com/lastpass-customer-info-leaked-again-after-third-party-data-breach/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf