What is the official website of K&L Gates Australia ?

The official website of K&L Gates Australia is https://www.klgates.com/Australia.

What is K&L Gates Australia's cybersecurity risk score?

K&L Gates Australia has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 751 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has K&L Gates Australia experienced?

According to Rankiteo, K&L Gates Australia currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has K&L Gates Australia been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, K&L Gates Australia has been affected by a supply chain cyber incident involving NA, with the incident ID OFCK&LAONPROKIRSHEPWCMOV1781843490.

Does K&L Gates Australia have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, K&L Gates Australia is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does K&L Gates Australia have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, K&L Gates Australia does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does K&L Gates Australia comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, K&L Gates Australia is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does K&L Gates Australia have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, K&L Gates Australia does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does K&L Gates Australia comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, K&L Gates Australia is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does K&L Gates Australia have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,K&L Gates Australia is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does K&L Gates Australia operate in ?

K&L Gates Australia operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.

How many employees does K&L Gates Australia have ?

K&L Gates Australia employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does K&L Gates Australia own any subsidiaries ?

K&L Gates Australia presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does K&L Gates Australia have ?

K&L Gates Australia's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 445 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for K&L Gates Australia ?

K&L Gates Australia is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.

Does K&L Gates Australia have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, K&L Gates Australia does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does K&L Gates Australia have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, K&L Gates Australia maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kl-gates-australia.

How many cybersecurity incidents has K&L Gates Australia experienced ?

As of October 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that K&L Gates Australia has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does K&L Gates Australia have ?

K&L Gates Australia has an estimated 16,317 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has K&L Gates Australia faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

KGA

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

751

/1000

Fair

776

/1000

Fair

K&L Gates Australia Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

klgates.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Our Australian offices are strategically positioned to confidently guide our clients through the full range of domestic and international legal matters with care and skill. Our 300 lawyers across four major Australian states leverage deep local knowledge and an unmatched global network to provide clients with the most innovative and sophisticated legal and business solutions, recognising every client has particular goals and challenges. Whether locally focussed or a global participant, we provide our clients with a full-service approach tailored toward domestic needs or in-bound investment from Australia's major trading partners in Asia, the United States, and Europe. We invest the time to understand your business and industry

KGA

K&L Gates Australia CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

K&L Gates

Ransomware

100

7/2023

OFCK&LAONPROKIR...

Loading…

A.I.

KGA Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for KGA

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for K&L Gates Australia in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for K&L Gates Australia in 2026.

Incident Types KGA vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for K&L Gates Australia in 2026.

Incident History - KGA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

K&L Gates Australia Subsidiaries

KGA

Law Practice

Website: https://www.klgates.com/Australia

Company Size: 201-500 employees

K&L GatesLaw Practice

K&L Gates ItaliaLaw Practice

K&L Gates BelgiumLaw Practice

K&L Gates Volckrick LuxembourgLaw Practice

K&L Gates AsiaLaw Practice

Loading…

K&L Gates Australia Similar Companies

DLA Piper

dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice

adalet.gov.tr

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Mission Our mission is to develop and implement policies to ensure the justice services in a fairness, fast and effective way by in reliance on the rule of law, human rights, judicial independence and impartiality. Vision Our vision is to provide a fair, reassuring, accessible and efficient justice system with respect to the rights and freedoms.

Loading…

NEWS

K&L Gates Australia CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-77684

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth Classic Hands-Free Profile HF role in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/hfp_hf.c does not release the AT command buffers that are still queued on hf->tx_pending when the RFCOMM DLC goes down. hfp_hf_disconnected() only cancelled the work items and cleared hf->acl, and no other code path ever dequeues those buffers, so each one is permanently lost from the fixed hf_pool (CONFIG_BT_MAX_CONN + 1 buffers, i.e. two in the default configuration). The same function also left BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_CONNECTED set, and hfp_hf_create() wiped the object with memset() as soon as hf->acl was NULL, without checking whether hf->work, hf->slc_work or hf->deferred_work was still pending or running. The remote Audio Gateway peer controls the trigger end to end and needs no application involvement: an unsolicited +BCS: 1 response makes bcs_handle() call bt_hfp_hf_select_codec() and queue an AT+BCS buffer, which cannot be transmitted while BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_RX_ONGOING is set, and an immediately following RFCOMM DISC strands that buffer. Repeating the connect / +BCS / disconnect cycle a couple of times empties hf_pool for good. With the pool exhausted, HFP command sending fails permanently, and because hfp_hf_send_cmd() allocates with K_FOREVER (bt_rfcomm_create_pdu() → bt_conn_create_pdu()) from the Bluetooth RX context — where that timeout is not downgraded to K_NO_WAIT — one further +BCS from the peer parks the Bluetooth RX thread inside net_buf_alloc() with no possible waker, halting all HCI event processing until the device is rebooted. Separately, reusing the HF slot while a work handler was still queued or running allowed memset() to wipe live k_work items out from under the system workqueue, corrupting shared kernel workqueue state. Exploitation requires an established HFP session (for SSP devices L2CAP enforces authentication before the RFCOMM channel is reachable) and a build with CONFIG_BT_HFP_HF enabled.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.1

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19595

SUMMARY

The user-mode syscall verifier z_vrfy_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() in subsys/rtio/rtio_syscalls.c validated its two output parameters, buff and buff_len, with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_READ() rather than K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(). Both are pure out-parameters: z_impl_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() stores the mempool buffer address and its length through them. The distinction is enforced by every architecture validator — arch_buffer_validate() on RISC-V PMP explicitly accepts the global __rom_region/__rodata_region for reads only, and the ARM MPU validators accept P_RO_U_RO and P_RW_U_RO regions for reads only — so a read-validated pointer is not necessarily writable by the calling thread. An unprivileged user-mode thread that has been granted access to an RTIO context (rtio_access_grant()) can invoke the rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() syscall with buff/buff_len pointing at memory it may read but not write, and with a completion-queue entry whose flags field it fully controls (only RTIO_CQE_FLAG_MEMPOOL_BUFFER in flags[7:0] is required; flags[19:8] and flags[31:20] supply the block index and count). The kernel then performs a pointer-sized and a 4-byte store through those addresses while running in supervisor mode. Reaching the store requires CONFIG_USERSPACE together with CONFIG_RTIO_SYS_MEM_BLOCKS, the configuration behind RTIO_DEFINE_WITH_MEMPOOL; without the latter the implementation returns -ENOTSUP and writes nothing. Two outcomes follow. If the target lies in a memory-domain partition declared K_MEM_PARTITION_P_RW_U_RO (privileged read-write, user read-only), the kernel-mode store succeeds and deposits partly attacker-chosen values into memory the memory domain had marked read-only for that thread, bypassing the partition's write protection. If the target lies in globally readable but unwritable memory such as .text/.rodata in flash, the store faults in kernel mode; the fault is delivered to z_fatal_error() and the default k_sys_fatal_error_handler() halts or reboots the device, giving an unprivileged thread a reliable full denial of service. The read-permission check does bound the damage: the address must still be readable by the calling thread, so kernel-private memory cannot be targeted and no confidential data is disclosed. The fix replaces both checks with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(), so a thread lacking write permission is terminated by K_OOPS before the implementation runs; the cqe argument correctly remains read-validated.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19178

SUMMARY

IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized administrative privileges due to a race condition.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7292610

CVE-2026-112991

SUMMARY

The html_to_markdown expansion module in MISP Modules contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its is_safe_url() URL validation function. The BLOCKED_RANGES list used to reject unsafe destination addresses was incomplete, omitting several critical IP address ranges. Specifically, the following ranges were not blocked: 0.0.0.0/8 (unspecified, which routes to loopback on Linux), 100.64.0.0/10 (carrier-grade NAT per RFC 6598), ::/128 (IPv6 unspecified), fc00::/7 (IPv6 Unique Local Addresses), and fe80::/10 (IPv6 link-local). The existing list only covered IPv4 loopback (127.0.0.0/8), RFC 1918 private ranges, IPv4 link-local (169.254.0.0/16), and IPv6 loopback (::1/128). An authenticated user with the ability to create or modify MISP attributes that trigger the html_to_markdown expansion module could supply URLs pointing to these unblocked internal address ranges. Because the module fetches the URL server-side to convert HTML content to Markdown, the request is made from the MISP server's network context. This allows an attacker to probe and read responses from internal services, carrier-grade NAT infrastructure, or link-local endpoints that would otherwise be unreachable from external networks. IPv4-mapped IPv6 forms (e.g., [::ffff:0.0.0.0]) also bypassed the existing checks. The security impact is primarily confidentiality: an attacker can read data served by internal services reachable from the MISP server. The MISP instance itself is not compromised, but it is abused as a proxy to access otherwise restricted network resources.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/misp/misp-modules/commit/98a1c2c2f297665dd8d4609e9cd644007a57516b

CVE-2026-112372

SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in H3C Magic NX15 V100R017. This affects the function importprofile of the file /api/upload. This manipulation of the argument fileName causes path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)

cvss2

Base Score: 5.8

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.7

Exploitability

2.3

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

K&L Gates Australia Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

KGA A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

K&L Gates Australia CyberSecurity News & History

KGA Company Scoring based on AI Models