Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (UCOKIT1774240010)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Kiteworks's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Kiteworks Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kiteworks breach identified under incident ID UCOKIT1774240010.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kiteworks's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kiteworkscgcp, the number of followers: 48933, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 354 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 740 and after the incident was 573 with a difference of -167 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kiteworks and their customers.
University of California (UC) Regents recently reported "UC Regents Settles $5.8 Million Class Action Over 2020-2021 Data Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
The University of California (UC) Regents has finalized a $5.8 million settlement in *Erazo v.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting File transfer application (Accellion FTA), and exposing Sensitive information of over 350,000 individuals, with nearly 353,265 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $5.8 million settlement.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Retired the vulnerable Accellion FTA system, and began remediation that includes Migrated to a secure file transfer product, increased system monitoring, provided security training for relevant employees, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified eligible claimants via email.
The case underscores how Settled, and recommending next steps like Retire vulnerable systems, migrate to secure alternatives, enhance monitoring, and provide security training, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Eligible claimants notified via email.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including compromised file transfer application licensed by Accellion, Inc., and vulnerability in Accellion FTA system. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Network Device Configuration (T1552.008) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised file transfer application (Accellion FTA) exposed sensitive data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed sensitive information of over 350,000 UC students and employees and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 2020 UC Undergraduate Experience Survey and medical records exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting 353,265 individuals due to compromised file transfer app. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerable Accellion FTA system retired post-breach and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive information exposed via compromised file transfer application. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised file transfer application likely accessed via legitimate credentials. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Kiteworks Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kiteworkscgcp/incident/UCOKIT1774240010
- Kiteworks CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kiteworkscgcp
- Kiteworks Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ucokit1774240010-the-regents-of-the-university-of-california-accellion-inc-breach-march-2026/
- Kiteworks CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kiteworkscgcp/history
- Kiteworks CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/nation/california/2026/03/20/over-350000-were-paid-in-a-class-action-against-erazo-v-the-regents-of-the-university-of-california/89186414007/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf