Comparison Overview
Kiteworks

Kiteworks
1510 Fashion Island Blvd, Suite 100, San Mateo, California, US, 94404
Last Update: 28/09/2026
Kiteworks empowers organizations with a robust control plane for secure data exchange, ensuring secure and compliant data exchanges across all channels, including email, file sharing, and APIs. To this end, we created a platform that delivers data governance, compliance...

PayPal
2211 North First Street, San Jose, 95131, US
Last Update: 13/10/2026
We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is to unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kiteworks







PayPal






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Kiteworks has 92.31% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
PayPal has 782.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Kiteworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kiteworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kiteworks

PayPal
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.