Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Kindthread » KINSCR1773679073

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KINSCR1773679073)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-104
Company Score Before Incident762 / 1000
Company Score After Incident658 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERKINSCR1773679073
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, dates...
INCIDENT DATE05/06/2024
STATUSSettled

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Kindthread's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Kindthread Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kindthread breach identified under incident ID KINSCR1773679073.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kindthread's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kindthread, the number of followers: 8358, the industry type: Retail Apparel and Fashion and the number of employees: 97 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 762 and after the incident was 658 with a difference of -104 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kindthread and their customers.

Scrubs & Beyond recently reported "Scrubs & Beyond and Kindthread Data Breach Settlement", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

301 Scrubs Investors LLC, operating as Scrubs & Beyond and Kindthread, agreed to settle a class action lawsuit following a June 2024 cyberattack that exposed sensitive personal data, including names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and employee identification numbers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, employee identification numbers, with nearly 301 individuals records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $2,500 settlement per eligible individual for documented losses.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notices sent to affected parties.

The case underscores how Settled, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notices sent to affected individuals with unique ID and PIN for claims.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack that exposed sensitive personal data and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating alleged failure to adequately protect sensitive data. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised files containing names, Social Security numbers and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating employee identification numbers compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting 301 individuals. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack that exposed sensitive personal data and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating identity theft risk such as High (exposure of SSNs and PII). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating alleged failure to adequately protect sensitive data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)

Sources & References