Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

KidoKido
VS
Chicago Public SchoolsChicago Public Schools
Kido

Kido

113 Blegborough Road, London, SW16 6DL, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://kidoschools.com
514/1000Critical

We are redefining early childhood education in more ways than one. We have created a comprehensive pedagogical framework and system with a view to delivering high quality early years education and care in any part of the world. Our schools take elements from multiple te...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:527
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Chicago Public Schools

Chicago Public Schools

42 West Madison Street, Chicago, 60602, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cps.edu
745/1000Moderate

Chicago Public Schools is looking for teachers, leaders, and non-instructional staff to transform the face of urban education. We are a team of passionate, committed, and talented professionals who believe that every CPS student will graduate prepared for success in col...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:37,366
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Kido

Kido

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chicago Public Schools

Chicago Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kido in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Public Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Kido (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kido cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chicago Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Kido

Kido

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
KID2592025100525
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KID1941219100525
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KID1602016100825
Chicago Public Schools

Chicago Public Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHI31924522

FAQ

Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Kido company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Kido and Chicago Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Kido and Chicago Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Kido or Chicago Public Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Kido or Chicago Public Schools ?
Between Kido and Chicago Public Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Kido and Chicago Public Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA