Comparison Overview
Kido

Kido
113 Blegborough Road, London, SW16 6DL, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are redefining early childhood education in more ways than one. We have created a comprehensive pedagogical framework and system with a view to delivering high quality early years education and care in any part of the world. Our schools take elements from multiple te...

Chicago Public Schools
42 West Madison Street, Chicago, 60602, US
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Chicago Public Schools is looking for teachers, leaders, and non-instructional staff to transform the face of urban education. We are a team of passionate, committed, and talented professionals who believe that every CPS student will graduate prepared for success in col...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Kido







Chicago Public Schools






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Kido in 2026.
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chicago Public Schools in 2026.
Incident History - Kido (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Kido cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Chicago Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Chicago Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Kido

Chicago Public Schools
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.