Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (RECKEL1774988711)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence breach identified under incident ID RECKEL1774988711.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kela-cyber, the number of followers: 14433, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 156 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 640 with a difference of -111 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence and their customers.
A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Iranian State-Backed Threat Actors Blur Lines Between Cybercrime and Espionage", has drawn attention.
Recent intelligence reveals Iranian state-sponsored cyber operations collaborating with criminal ransomware groups to conduct financially motivated attacks under the guise of extortion.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting healthcare, education and financial institutions, and exposing True.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as The convergence of state-sponsored cyber warfare and cybercrime creates serious legal and operational risks. Traditional security measures must account for hybrid threats blending espionage, sabotage, and financial crime, and recommending next steps like Organizations must heighten vigilance, ensure compliance with OFAC sanctions, and implement robust patching and backup strategies to mitigate hybrid threats.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting vulnerabilities in VPNs and firewalls to gain initial access and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting vulnerabilities in VPNs and firewalls. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating deploying pseudo-ransomware to mask destructive campaigns. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating backdoors established via VPN and firewall exploitation. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exploiting vulnerabilities in VPNs and firewalls. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating disguising sabotage as extortion via ransomware-style encryption and Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating repurposed Apostle malware as ransomware to disguise sabotage. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation of VPN and firewall vulnerabilities. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration and encryption observed in ransomware attacks. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration as part of ransomware operations. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) platform on I2P network. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration observed in ransomware attacks. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (Pay2Key, Apostle, ROADSWEEP) encrypt data, Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating destructive wiper disguised as ransomware (ROADSWEEP), and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data leaks used to pressure adversaries. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kela-cyber/incident/RECKEL1774988711
- KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kela-cyber
- KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/reckel1774988711-alphvblackcat-pay2key-ransomware-august-2024/
- KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kela-cyber/history
- KELA - Cyber Threat Intelligence CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://industrialcyber.co/ransomware/iranian-hackers-target-us-critical-infrastructure-through-ransomware-proxies-kela-warns/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf