Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KEE1781619998)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Kee Wah Bakery's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Kee Wah Bakery Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kee Wah Bakery breach identified under incident ID KEE1781619998.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kee Wah Bakery's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kee-wah-bakery, the number of followers: 819, the industry type: Food and Beverage Manufacturing and the number of employees: 77 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 747 and after the incident was 647 with a difference of -100 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kee Wah Bakery and their customers.
On 10 November 2023, Kee Wah Bakery disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Kee Wah Bakery Ransomware Attack with Potential Data Exposure".
Hong Kong-based bakery chain Kee Wah Bakery disclosed a ransomware attack on its internal network system, detected after abnormal operations triggered a ransom note.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Internal network system, and exposing Personal data of employees, business partners, online customers, and loyalty program members.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Contained the breach and secured systems, and began remediation that includes Initiated investigation, notified affected individuals, planned security review and system upgrades, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notified potentially affected individuals, disclosed incident publicly.
The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Comprehensive security review and system upgrades to strengthen defenses, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notified potentially affected individuals.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack on its internal network system and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating abnormal operations triggered a ransom note (implies access). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack detected after abnormal operations and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware triggered ransom note (implies execution). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating internal network system compromised (implies persistence). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of employees, partners compromised. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack detected after abnormal operations and Execution Guardrails (T1480) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware triggered ransom note (implies evasion). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of employees, partners compromised. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating loyalty program members data compromised and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating personal data...compromised via internal network. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of employees, partners, customers compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration under investigation. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack triggered a ransom note. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Kee Wah Bakery Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kee-wah-bakery/incident/KEE1781619998
- Kee Wah Bakery CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kee-wah-bakery
- Kee Wah Bakery Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/kee1781619998-kee-wah-bakery-ransomware-june-2026/
- Kee Wah Bakery CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kee-wah-bakery/history
- Kee Wah Bakery CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.thestandard.com.hk/news/article/334831/Kee-Wah-Bakery-hit-by-ransomware-attack-customer-and-staff-data-compromised
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf