Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (JBSKASCOL1773505774)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Kaseya's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Kaseya Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kaseya breach identified under incident ID JBSKASCOL1773505774.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kaseya's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kaseya, the number of followers: 205033, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 5502 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 758 and after the incident was 551 with a difference of -207 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kaseya and their customers.
Colonial Pipeline recently reported "Ransomware Surge: Sophistication, Costs, and Evolving Threats Reshape Cybersecurity Landscape", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Ransomware attacks have reached unprecedented levels of sophistication, with demands now exceeding tens of millions of dollars.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Industrial control systems (ICS), Operational technology (OT) and Remote-management tools, and exposing High-value data, Customer data and Operational data, plus an estimated financial loss of ['$4.4 million (Colonial Pipeline)', '$11 million (JBS)', '$40 million (CNA Financial)'].
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Hard shutdowns and Forensic analysis, and began remediation that includes Decryption alternatives and Backup recovery, while recovery efforts such as Data restoration and System cleanup continue.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Resilience against ransomware is rooted in prevention, preparation, response, and recovery. Key lessons include the importance of cybersecurity hygiene, securing RDP and Active Directory, enforcing MFA, patch management, employee training, and developing robust business continuity plans. Organizations must also prioritize asset protection, engage boards in cybersecurity discussions, and coordinate with law enforcement and insurers during incidents, and recommending next steps like Secure RDP with strong passwords, MFA, and restricted access, Enforce MFA for critical assets and Patch legacy systems and vulnerabilities.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including unsecured RDP, and unpatched legacy systems, Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 75% of ransomware breaches originate from phishing emails, Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including rDP compromises, and lack of MFA for critical assets, and Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) compromises. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution (T1204) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 60% of malware is installed via desktop-sharing apps and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disabling command-line capabilities recommended. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including active Directory vulnerabilities, and lack of MFA and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including rDP compromises, and desktop-sharing apps. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including active Directory vulnerabilities, and unsecured RDP and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched legacy systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including lack of MFA, and rDP compromises, Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disabling command-line capabilities recommended, and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating prolonged dwell time attacks. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unsecured RDP with weak passwords and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including rDP compromises, and active Directory vulnerabilities. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating hackers lurk undetected to identify high-value data and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating prolonged dwell time attacks. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including rDP compromises, and desktop-sharing apps and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating active Directory vulnerabilities. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating high-value data identified during dwell time and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating operational data compromised. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating tCP port 445 blocking recommended and Proxy (T1090) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating prolonged dwell time attacks. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in ransomware attacks and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating supply-chain attacks rose 42% in Q1 2021. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption confirmed in ransomware attacks, Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including hard shutdowns by attackers, and 21 days average downtime, and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating complicates restoration efforts. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Kaseya Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kaseya/incident/JBSKASCOL1773505774
- Kaseya CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kaseya
- Kaseya Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/jbskascol1773505774-jbs-kaseya-colonial-pipeline-ransomware-january-2021/
- Kaseya CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/kaseya/history
- Kaseya CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/ransomware-prevention-how-organizations-can-fight-back
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf