Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Karolinska Institutet » KAR1777991808

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KAR1777991808)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-71
Company Score Before Incident792 / 1000
Company Score After Incident721 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERKAR1777991808
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNames, email addresses, content of...
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Karolinska Institutet's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Karolinska Institutet Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Karolinska Institutet breach identified under incident ID KAR1777991808.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Karolinska Institutet's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/karolinska-institutet, the number of followers: 145157, the industry type: Higher Education and the number of employees: 9826 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 792 and after the incident was 721 with a difference of -71 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Karolinska Institutet and their customers.

Karolinska Institutet (KI) recently reported "Data Breach in Canvas Learning Platform Affects Karolinska Institutet and Global Users", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Karolinska Institutet (KI), a leading Swedish medical university, has confirmed that its students and staff were impacted by a recent data breach in Canvas, a widely used cloud-based learning platform.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Canvas learning platform, and exposing Names, email addresses, content of private messages.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Users advised to exercise caution in private communications.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Users advised to exercise caution in private communications.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach in Canvas, a widely used cloud-based learning platform and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating canvas platform utilized by thousands of educational institutions. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Chat Messages (T1552.008) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating content of private messages exposed in the breach. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, email addresses, and private message content compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting students and staff of Karolinska Institutet and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating canvas is a cloud-based learning platform. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on the breach’s origin or extent and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating private message content exposed; potential for manipulation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Chat Messages (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References