Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Kaluga Astral » KAL1781540804

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KAL1781540804)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-13
Company Score Before Incident813 / 1000
Company Score After Incident800 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERKAL1781540804
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNo evidence of customer data...
INCIDENT DATE31/05/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Kaluga Astral's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Kaluga Astral Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Kaluga Astral breach identified under incident ID KAL1781540804.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Kaluga Astral's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kaluga-astral, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Information Technology & Services and the number of employees: 30 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 813 and after the incident was 800 with a difference of -13 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Kaluga Astral and their customers.

Kaluga Astral recently reported "Russian Software Firm Kaluga Astral Hit by Cyberattack, Disrupting Critical Business Services", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Russian software provider Kaluga Astral confirmed a cyberattack earlier this month that disrupted key services for nearly a week, impacting businesses reliant on its tax reporting, electronic document management, and authentication systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting tax reporting systems, electronic document management systems and authentication systems, and exposing No evidence of customer data leaks or compromise.

In response, and began remediation that includes Recovery efforts prioritized security over speed, and stakeholders are being briefed through Limited public disclosures on the incident’s origin or technical details.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted key services...tax reporting, electronic document management and Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating software provider Kaluga Astral...impacting businesses reliant on its systems. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Service Stop (T1489) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted key services for nearly a week...cash register functionality, corporate portals and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating loss of access to digital certificate-based authentication. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating recovery efforts prioritized security over speed, delaying full restoration and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating limited public disclosures on the incident’s origin or technical details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of customer data leaks or compromise. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Supply Chain Compromise (40%)
Impact
Service Stop (90%)
Defacement (30%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (20%)

Sources & References