Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Jones Day » JONBRYFOX1781043906

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (JONBRYFOX1781043906)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-60
Company Score Before Incident523 / 1000
Company Score After Incident463 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERJONBRYFOX1781043906
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORSocial Engineering
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal data, including names...
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Jones Day's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Jones Day Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Jones Day breach identified under incident ID JONBRYFOX1781043906.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Jones Day's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/jones-day, the number of followers: 127186, the industry type: Law Practice and the number of employees: 6333 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 523 and after the incident was 463 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Jones Day and their customers.

On 09 June 2024, Fox Rothschild disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Fox Rothschild Data Breach and Class Action Lawsuit".

A proposed class action lawsuit was filed against U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting One device, and exposing Sensitive personal data, including names and Social Security numbers.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Security protocols contained the incident’s scope, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifications to be issued as required by law.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifications to be issued as required by law.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sophisticated social engineering event targeting a single attorney and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating social engineering event targeting a single attorney. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromising only one device via social engineering. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data, including names and Social Security numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach attributed to the Silent Ransom Group. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating silent Ransom Group has targeted law firms since 2023 and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating failure to protect sensitive personal data. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sophisticated social engineering event. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading (60%)