What is the official website of Jinglebell ?

The official website of Jinglebell is http://www.jinglebell.com.

What is Jinglebell's cybersecurity risk score?

Jinglebell has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 757 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Jinglebell experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Jinglebell currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Jinglebell been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Jinglebell has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Jinglebell have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Jinglebell is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Jinglebell have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Jinglebell does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Jinglebell comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Jinglebell is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Jinglebell have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Jinglebell does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Jinglebell comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Jinglebell is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Jinglebell have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Jinglebell is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Jinglebell operate in ?

Jinglebell operates primarily in the Media Production industry.

How many employees does Jinglebell have ?

Jinglebell employs approximately 37 people worldwide.

Does Jinglebell own any subsidiaries ?

Jinglebell presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Jinglebell have ?

Jinglebell's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,132 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Jinglebell ?

Jinglebell is classified under the NAICS code 51211, which corresponds to Motion Picture and Video Production.

Does Jinglebell have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Jinglebell does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Jinglebell have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Jinglebell maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/jinglebell-communication-s.r.l..

How many cybersecurity incidents has Jinglebell experienced ?

As of June 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Jinglebell has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Jinglebell have ?

Jinglebell has an estimated 6,783 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Jinglebell

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

757

/1000

Fair

782

/1000

Fair

Jinglebell Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

jinglebell.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Jinglebell è una Service Company italiana nata nel 1981 come casa di produzione audio per il mercato della comunicazione. Divenuta negli anni il punto di riferimento per alcuni fra i più grandi brand nazionali ed esteri, oggi Jinglebell ha ampliato la propria struttura, con cinque studi di registrazione, e la propria offerta, dando vita a quattro marchi diversi: • Jinglebell Voice & Music, specializzato in produzione audio pubblicitaria • Jinglebell Communication, brand dedicato al doppiaggio di film e serie televisive • Jinglebell Localization, focalizzato sulla localizzazione di videogiochi • The Woods Digital Ecosystem, agenzia interna che genera contenuti web per brand e imprese

Jinglebell A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Jinglebell

Jinglebell CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

Jinglebell Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Jinglebell

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jinglebell in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jinglebell in 2026.

Incident Types Jinglebell vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jinglebell in 2026.

Incident History - Jinglebell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Jinglebell Subsidiaries

Jinglebell

Media Production

Website: http://www.jinglebell.com

Company Size: 37

Keywords StudiosComputer Games

Lakshya DigitalComputer Games

SperasoftComputer Games

Helpshift, a Keywords TechnologySoftware Development

VOLTAEntertainment Providers

Studio GoboComputer Games

Smoking Gun Interactive Inc.Computer Games

AMC StudioComputer Games

Heavy Iron Studios, Inc.Computer Games

Waste CreativeAdvertising Services

d3tComputer Games

Liquid DevelopmentComputer Games

Wicked WorkshopComputer Games

Hardsuit LabsComputer Games

Tantalus MediaComputer Games

Forgotten EmpiresComputer Games

Player ResearchComputer Games

ICHI WorldwideAdvertising Services

gnet agencyAdvertising Services

Binari SonoriTranslation and Localization

Mighty Games GroupComputer Games

Coconut LizardSoftware Development

WizcorpComputer Games

Fire Without SmokeAdvertising Services

Sound Lab a Keywords StudioEntertainment Providers

Indigo Pearl UKPublic Relations and Communications Services

Syllabes - Studio & AcademyBroadcast Media Production and Distribution

XLOC, INC.Computer Games

asrec - a Keywords studioTranslation and Localization

Keywords Studios Germany GmbHComputer Games

LacedEntertainment Providers

PXN DigitalPublic Relations and Communications Services

Keywords Studios - MontréalComputer Games

Loading…

Jinglebell Similar Companies

Freelancer

wikipedia.org

A freelancer or freelance worker is a term commonly used for a person who is self-employed and is not necessarily committed to a particular employer long-term. Freelance workers are sometimes represented by a company or a temporary agency that resells freelance labor to clients; others work independently or use professional associations or websites to get work. While the term "independent contractor" would be used in a higher register of English to designate the tax and employment class of this type of worker, the term freelancing is most common in culture and creative industries and this term specifically motions to participation therein. Fields, professions and industries where freelancing is predominant include music, writing, acting, computer programming, web design, translating and illustrating, and other forms of piece work which some cultural theorists consider as central to the cognitive-cultural economy.

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

wonderl.ink

Bertelsmann ist ein Medien-, Dienstleistungs- und Bildungsunternehmen mit rund 75.000 Mitarbeitenden, das in gut 50 Ländern der Welt aktiv ist. Zum Konzernverbund gehören das Entertainment-Unternehmen RTL Group, die Buchverlagsgruppe Penguin Random House, das Musikunternehmen BMG, der Dienstleister Arvato Group, Bertelsmann Marketing Services, die Bertelsmann Education Group sowie das internationale Fondsnetzwerk Bertelsmann Investments. Das Unternehmen erzielte im Geschäftsjahr 2024 einen Umsatz von 19 Mrd. Euro. Bertelsmann steht für Kreativität und Unternehmertum. Diese Kombination ermöglicht erstklassige Medienangebote und innovative Servicelösungen, die Kunden in aller Welt begeistern. www.bertelsmann.com

Loading…

NEWS

Jinglebell CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

November 01, 2025 07:00 AM

Mount Union expands MBA program with in-demand programs

University of Mount Union has expanded its MBA program to include AI, cybersecurity and finance programs.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…