Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Jamco » JAM1773203261

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (JAM1773203261)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-109
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident646 / 1000
Company LinkView Jamco Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERJAM1773203261
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORRemote Code Execution (CVE-2024-57727 in SimpleHelp)
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive data including private documents,...
INCIDENT DATE10/08/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Jamco's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Jamco Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Jamco breach identified under incident ID JAM1773203261.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Jamco's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/jamco-news, the number of followers: 12531, the industry type: Airlines and Aviation and the number of employees: 684 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 646 with a difference of -109 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Jamco and their customers.

On 06 August 2025, Jamco Aerospace disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Play Ransomware Targets Jamco Aerospace, Threatens Data Leak".

Jamco Aerospace, a New York-based engineering firm supplying critical components to aerospace and defense manufacturers including U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive data including private documents, client records, payroll, financial information, IDs, and tax files.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploit CVE-2024-57727, a remote code execution vulnerability in SimpleHelp. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-57727 in SimpleHelp) and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating customized ransomware binaries...recompiling them to evade detection. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating simpleHelp remote management tool exploited (implies potential account misuse). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-57727 in SimpleHelp). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating customized ransomware binaries...recompiling them to evade detection and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating eSXi variant...automatically powers off all VMs before encryption. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating iDs and tax files exfiltrated (implies potential credential harvesting). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating eSXi variant...listing machine names before encryption. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating private documents, client records, payroll, financial information, IDs, tax files. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed; Play has begun releasing portions of it. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating data encryption confirmed; Play ransomware strain used and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating eSXi variant shuts down VMs and encrypts VM-related files. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (80%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)
Inhibit System Recovery (80%)