Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IVAAUT1770515557)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Ivanti's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Ivanti Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ivanti breach identified under incident ID IVAAUT1770515557.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ivanti's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ivanti, the number of followers: 165752, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 2975 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 640 and after the incident was 635 with a difference of -5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ivanti and their customers.
Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) recently reported "Dutch Government Agencies Hit by Major Data Breach via Ivanti Software Flaw", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
A critical vulnerability in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile software has led to a significant data breach affecting multiple Dutch government agencies, including the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) and the Council for Justice.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile, and exposing Names, email addresses, phone numbers.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Risks posed by third-party software vulnerabilities in high-security environments; potential for follow-on attacks like phishing or identity fraud.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including critical vulnerability in Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile software, and exploitation of software vulnerability. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Credential Access (T1212) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized parties exploited the flaw to access employees’ personal information. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, email addresses, and phone numbers compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating significant data breach affecting multiple Dutch government agencies. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data manipulation and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential follow-on attacks such as phishing or identity fraud. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation of Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile flaw in high-security environments. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Ivanti Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ivanti/incident/IVAAUT1770515557
- Ivanti CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ivanti
- Ivanti Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ivaaut1770515557-ivanti-dutch-data-protection-authority-vulnerability-january-2026/
- Ivanti CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/ivanti/history
- Ivanti CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://databreaches.net/2026/02/07/several-dutch-agencies-suffer-major-data-breach/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf