Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Israeli Ministry of Defense » ISR1774664743

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ISR1774664743)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-21
Company Score Before Incident727 / 1000
Company Score After Incident706 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERISR1774664743
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORCompromised Surveillance Cameras, Payment Systems, Government Websites, Critical Infrastructure
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE03/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Israeli Ministry of Defense's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Israeli Ministry of Defense Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Israeli Ministry of Defense breach identified under incident ID ISR1774664743.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Israeli Ministry of Defense's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/israelimod, the number of followers: 36441, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 891 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 727 and after the incident was 706 with a difference of -21 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Israeli Ministry of Defense and their customers.

On 28 February 2024, Israeli Oil and Gas Company disclosed Cyber Espionage, Disruption and Hacktivism issues under the banner "Iran-Linked Cyberattacks Escalate Following U.S.-Led Strike on Iranian Leadership".

Following a U.S.-led military operation on February 24 that resulted in the assassination of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran-backed hackers have intensified cyberattacks against Israel, the U.S., and Gulf nations, targeting critical infrastructure and surve...

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Surveillance Cameras, Payment Systems and Government Websites.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Cyber operations in modern conflict no longer require physical presence in Iran, allowing attacks to continue despite military setbacks. The escalation underscores the growing role of cyber warfare in geopolitical tensions.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised two types of surveillance cameras widely used and Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating surveillance cameras widely used in Israel, Qatar, Bahrain. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating likely to assess missile-related damage via surveillance cameras. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Archive Collected Data (T1560) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating assess missile-related damage via surveillance cameras and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised surveillance cameras for damage assessment. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating shutdown of Jordanian gas stations, disruptions to Israeli payment systems and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attacks on wheat silo management systems (Jordan). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pro-Iran hacktivist groups launching attacks since February 28. Under the Reconnaissance tactic, the analysis identified Active Scanning (T1595) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating assess missile-related damage via compromised surveillance cameras. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (70%)
Supply Chain Compromise (60%)
Persistence
Server Software Component: Web Shell (50%)
Collection
Archive Collected Data (70%)
Automated Collection (60%)
Impact
Service Stop (80%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (60%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (70%)
Reconnaissance
Active Scanning (70%)

Sources & References