Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » IRIS Corporation » IRISEN1770760646

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IRISEN1770760646)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-16
Company Score Before Incident796 / 1000
Company Score After Incident780 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERIRISEN1770760646
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED139 terabytes of data, including...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of IRIS Corporation's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts IRIS Corporation Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the IRIS Corporation breach identified under incident ID IRISEN1770760646.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of IRIS Corporation's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/iris-corporation, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Retail Office Equipment and the number of employees: 4 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 796 and after the incident was 780 with a difference of -16 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on IRIS Corporation and their customers.

Directorate of File Automation (DAF) recently reported "Senegal Halts National ID Issuance After Suspected Coordinated Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Senegal has temporarily suspended the issuance of national ID cards following a reported data breach affecting the country’s population database.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting National ID issuance system, population database, taxation system (previous incident), and exposing 139 terabytes of data, including biometrics, identity records, and immigration files.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Temporary suspension of national ID issuance, and stakeholders are being briefed through Government assured public that personal data remained intact.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Government assured public that personal data remained intact.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating iris Corporation, the Malaysian firm contracted to produce Senegal’s national ID cards and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating coordinated cyberattack affecting population database and digital transformation agency. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating biometrics, identity records, and immigration files allegedly exfiltrated and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating 139 terabytes of data, including biometrics, compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 139 terabytes of data, including biometrics and identity records, exfiltrated and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating population database and immigration files targeted in breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating green Blood Group claimed exfiltration of 139 terabytes of data and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating coordinated attack on digital transformation agency and ID system. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating temporary suspension of national ID issuance due to breach and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating disruption to digital transformation initiatives and ID system. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating coordinated attack on multiple government systems suggests valid account abuse and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating temporary suspension of ID issuance indicates system disruption. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Trusted Relationship (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Defacement (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References