Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » IPPC Pharmacy » IPP1775255248

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (IPP1775255248)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-132
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident623 / 1000
Company LinkView IPPC Pharmacy Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERIPP1775255248
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal identifiers, medical data, financial...
INCIDENT DATE17/09/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of IPPC Pharmacy's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts IPPC Pharmacy Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the IPPC Pharmacy breach identified under incident ID IPP1775255248.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of IPPC Pharmacy's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ippc-pharmacy, the number of followers: 274, the industry type: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and the number of employees: 93 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 623 with a difference of -132 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on IPPC Pharmacy and their customers.

On 18 September 2025, IPPC (IPPC of New York, Innovative Pharmacy) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "IPPC Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient and Financial Information Across Six States".

IPPC, a long-term care pharmacy services provider operating under IPPC of New York and Innovative Pharmacy, disclosed a data breach involving unauthorized access to its network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal identifiers, medical data, financial records.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifying affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifying affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its network over a two-day period and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating pharmacy services provider with network access. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access suggests credential compromise and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, Medicare/Medicaid IDs compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating copied and potentially viewed sensitive files (personal, medical, financial) and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating medical record numbers, prescription information, billing/claims data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unknown actor copied and potentially viewed sensitive files and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving unauthorized access to network. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential class action lawsuit citing privacy violations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References